These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3083925)

  • 1. Compulsory treatment of the mentally ill.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Mar; 292(6524):888-9. PubMed ID: 3083925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment of uncooperative psychiatric patients in the community: Mental Health Act in need of reform.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1986 Apr; 1(8485):863-4. PubMed ID: 2870350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Compulsory treatment in the community for the mentally ill?
    Dyer C
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 Oct; 295(6604):991-2. PubMed ID: 3119134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some empirical findings on the right to refuse treatment.
    Carter JH
    N C Med J; 1983 Mar; 44(3):108, 113. PubMed ID: 6573573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When can a patient sue for negligence and wrongful detention under the Mental Health Act?
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1985 Oct; 2(8458):789-90. PubMed ID: 11644489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Involuntary administration of medication in the community: the judicial opportunity.
    Schmidt MJ; Geller JL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 2571371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mental Health Act 1983.
    Hamilton JR
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 May; 286(6379):1720-5. PubMed ID: 6405948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act?
    Bradley C; Marshall M; Gath D
    BMJ; 1995 Feb; 310(6976):364-7. PubMed ID: 7632216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of Rogers on forensic, emergency psychiatry.
    Moldin SO
    Am J Psychiatry; 1985 Dec; 142(12):1521-2. PubMed ID: 4073333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detention of potentially dangerous people.
    Lancet; 1998 Nov; 352(9141):1641. PubMed ID: 9853429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The patient's right to refuse anti-psychotic drugs: the Court of Appeals decision in Rogers v. Okin.
    Cole R
    Medicoleg News; 1981 Feb; 9(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 10314530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consent and the mentally handicapped.
    Dyer C
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 Jul; 295(6592):257-8. PubMed ID: 3115398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medicine court: Rogers in practice.
    Veliz J; James WS
    Am J Psychiatry; 1987 Jan; 144(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 3799842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protecting the rights of detained patients.
    Barnes M
    Med Law; 1996; 15(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 9009596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Liberty: human rights and mental health.
    Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers
    Common Law World Rev; 2002; 31(2):107-22. PubMed ID: 15973805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Legislation concerning patients' rights in Israel and in Britain.
    Levy A; Davidson S
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1986; 23(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 3804693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. R v. Canons Park Mental Health Review Tribunal, ex parte A.
    Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1993 Jul; [1994] 1():481-94. PubMed ID: 11648636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mental health review tribunals.
    Khan AN; Murgatroyd DS
    Solicit J; 1988 May; 132(19):682-4. PubMed ID: 11659117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment of the mentally ill: legal advocacy enters the second generation.
    Rubenstein LS
    Am J Psychiatry; 1986 Oct; 143(10):1264-9. PubMed ID: 3766789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Re H (Mental Patients: Diagnosis).
    Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice. Family Division
    Fam Law Rep; 1992 Jul; [1993] 1():28-33. PubMed ID: 12041093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.