196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30839461)
1. Cartilage and Fascia Graft In Type 1 Tympanoplasty: Comparison of Anatomical and Audological Results.
Mouna B; Khalifa M; Ghammem M; Limam M; Meherzi A; Kermani W; Abdelkefi M
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 30(4):e297-e300. PubMed ID: 30839461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of temporal muscle fascia and cartilage grafts in pediatric tympanoplasties.
Demirci S; Tuzuner A; Karadas H; Acıkgoz C; Caylan R; Samim EE
Am J Otolaryngol; 2014; 35(6):796-9. PubMed ID: 25115537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fascia versus cartilage graft in type I tympanoplasty: audiological outcome.
Kim JY; Oh JH; Lee HH
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e605-8. PubMed ID: 23172493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cartilage graft or fascia in tympanoplasty in patients with low middle ear risk index (anatomical and audological results).
Callioglu EE; Ceylan BT; Kuran G; Demirci S; Tulaci KG; Caylan R
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Nov; 270(11):2833-7. PubMed ID: 23266869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric patients: Comparison of fascia and perichondrium grafts.
Çayir S; Kayabaşi S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 121():95-98. PubMed ID: 30878559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the anatomical and functional success of fascia and perichondrium grafts in transcanal endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty.
Özdamar K; Sen A
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(1):67. PubMed ID: 31771648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does cartilage tympanoplasty impair hearing in patients with normal preoperative hearing? A comparison of different techniques.
Balcı MK; İşlek A; Ciğer E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 276(3):673-677. PubMed ID: 30600345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of cartilage graft and fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang T; Wu X; Peng X; Zhang Y; Xie S; Sun H
Acta Otolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 136(11):1085-1090. PubMed ID: 27310768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Audiological and graft take results of cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty (a new technique) versus fascia.
Tek A; Karaman M; Uslu C; Habeşoğlu T; Kılıçarslan Y; Durmuş R; Esen S; Egeli E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Apr; 269(4):1117-26. PubMed ID: 21968630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of temporalis fascia muscle and full-thickness cartilage grafts in type 1 pediatric tympanoplasties.
Yegin Y; Çelik M; Koç AK; Küfeciler L; Elbistanlı MS; Kayhan FT
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2016; 82(6):695-701. PubMed ID: 27068884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with double layer graft (modified sandwich fascia) technique and single layer graft (underlay fascia and underlay cartilage) technique.
Nemade SV; Shinde KJ; Sampate PB
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Jun; 45(3):440-446. PubMed ID: 28855058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic tympanoplasty with limited tympanomeatal flap elevation in pediatric cases: comparison of anatomic and audiological results of grafts.
Şen A; Özdamar K
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Sep; 276(9):2427-2432. PubMed ID: 31187239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Candidate's thesis: Revision tympanoplasty utilizing fossa triangularis cartilage.
Moore GF
Laryngoscope; 2002 Sep; 112(9):1543-54. PubMed ID: 12352661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of a microsliced modified chondroperichondrium shield graft and a temporalis fascia graft in primary type I tympanoplasty: A prospective randomized controlled trial.
Bhattacharya SN; Pal S; Saha S; Gure PK; Roy A
Ear Nose Throat J; 2016 Jul; 95(7):274-83. PubMed ID: 27434476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The wheel-shaped composite cartilage graft (WsCCG) and temporalis fascia for type 1 tympanoplasty: a prospective, randomized study.
Ciğer E; Balcı MK; İşlek A; Önal K
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Dec; 275(12):2975-2981. PubMed ID: 30317384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The button graft technique for perforations affecting less than 25% of the tympanic membrane: a non-randomised comparison of a new modification to cartilage tympanoplasty with underlay and overlay grafts.
Abdelghany AM
Clin Otolaryngol; 2013 Jun; 38(3):208-16. PubMed ID: 23745532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is type 1 tympanoplasty effective in elderly patients? Comparison of fascia and perichondrium grafts.
Cayir S; Kayabasi S; Hizli O
Acta Otolaryngol; 2019 Sep; 139(9):734-738. PubMed ID: 31271337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Perichondrium/Cartilage island flap and temporalis muscle fascia in type I tympanoplasty.
Onal K; Arslanoglu S; Oncel S; Songu M; Kopar A; Demiray U
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 21777547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty in children: anatomic and functional results.
Ozbek C; Ciftçi O; Tuna EE; Yazkan O; Ozdem C
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):679-83. PubMed ID: 18580702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Audiological Outcomes of Type 1 Tympanoplasty Using Conchal Cartilage and Temporalis Fascia.
Haq IU; Liaqat N; Din IU; Khan I; Ullah S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2023 Dec; 33(12):1445-1448. PubMed ID: 38062604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
