300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30840668)
1. Speech perception in noise: Impact of directional microphones in users of combined electric-acoustic stimulation.
Weissgerber T; Stöver T; Baumann U
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213251. PubMed ID: 30840668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved speech reception and sound quality with the DUET2 audio processor for electric acoustic stimulation.
Kleine Punte A; Mertens G; Cochet E; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
Acta Otolaryngol; 2015; 135(10):1022-9. PubMed ID: 26073650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of hearing aid settings for electric-acoustic stimulation.
Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Adunka MC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 24828214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microphone directionality and wind noise reduction enhance speech perception in users of the MED-EL SONNET audio processor.
Hagen R; Radeloff A; Stark T; Anderson I; Nopp P; Aschbacher E; Möltner A; Khajehnouri Y; Rak K
Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 31524107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of a moving noise masker on speech perception in cochlear implant users.
Weissgerber T; Rader T; Baumann U
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126133. PubMed ID: 25970594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report.
Wolfe J; Neumann S; Schafer E; Marsh M; Wood M; Baker RS
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):127-140. PubMed ID: 28240980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acceptance and fitting of the DUET device - a combined speech processor for electric acoustic stimulation.
Helbig S; Baumann U
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():81-87. PubMed ID: 19955724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech understanding and listening effort in cochlear implant users - microphone beamformers lead to significant improvements in noisy environments.
Büchner A; Schwebs M; Lenarz T
Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31590612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison.
Rader T; Adel Y; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.
Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A multicentre clinical evaluation of paediatric cochlear implant users upgrading to the Nucleus(®) 6 system.
Plasmans A; Rushbrooke E; Moran M; Spence C; Theuwis L; Zarowski A; Offeciers E; Atkinson B; McGovern J; Dornan D; Leigh J; Kaicer A; Hollow R; Martelli L; Looi V; Nel E; Del Dot J; Cowan R; Mauger SJ
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 83():193-9. PubMed ID: 26968076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new audio processor for combined electric and acoustic stimulation for the treatment of partial deafness.
Lorens A; Zgoda M; Skarzynski H
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jul; 132(7):739-50. PubMed ID: 22668312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigating Speech Recognition and listening effort with different device configurations in adult cochlear implant users.
Sladen DP; Nie Y; Berg K
Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):119-130. PubMed ID: 29457564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving Cochlear Implant Performance in the Wind Through Spectral Masking Release: A Multi-microphone and Multichannel Strategy.
Chung K
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):420-432. PubMed ID: 31425361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of the subjective benefit of electric acoustic stimulation with the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.
Gstoettner WK; Van de Heyning P; O'Connor AF; Kiefer J; Morera C; Sainz M; Vermeire K; McDonald S; Cavallé L; Valdecasas JG; Adunka OF; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Helbig S
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2011; 73(6):321-9. PubMed ID: 21997337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) with the Naída CI Q90 sound processor in experienced cochlear implant users.
Battmer RD; Scholz S; Geissler G; Ernst A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):331-340. PubMed ID: 31464168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
