These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30841791)

  • 1. Response-adaptive treatment allocation for clinical studies with ordinal responses.
    Lu TY; Chung KP; Poon WY; Cheung SH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Feb; 29(2):359-373. PubMed ID: 30841791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of treatments with ordinal responses in trials with sequential monitoring and response-adaptive randomization.
    Yu Y; Xu C; Zhong J; Cheung SH
    Stat Med; 2022 Nov; 41(25):5061-5083. PubMed ID: 35973712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adaptive treatment allocation for comparative clinical studies with recurrent events data.
    Gao J; Su PF; Hu F; Cheung SH
    Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):183-196. PubMed ID: 31282997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response-adaptive treatment allocation for survival trials with clustered right-censored data.
    Su PF; Cheung SH
    Stat Med; 2018 Jul; 37(16):2427-2439. PubMed ID: 29672881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Step-up testing procedure for multiple comparisons with a control for a latent variable model with ordered categorical responses.
    Lin Y; Kwong KS; Cheung SH; Poon WY
    Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(21):3629-38. PubMed ID: 24757077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response-adaptive treatment allocation for clinical studies with recurrent event and terminal event data.
    Su PF
    Stat Med; 2022 Jan; 41(2):258-275. PubMed ID: 34693543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two treatments with skewed ordinal responses.
    Lu TY; Poon WY; Cheung SH
    Stat Med; 2016 Jan; 35(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 26289419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A unified framework for the comparison of treatments with ordinal responses.
    Lu TY; Poon WY; Cheung SH
    Psychometrika; 2014 Oct; 79(4):605-20. PubMed ID: 24288031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple comparisons with a control for a latent variable model with ordered categorical responses.
    Lu TY; Poon WY; Cheung SH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):949-67. PubMed ID: 22267547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple comparisons with two controls for ordered categorical responses.
    Yang P; Hung Cheung S; Poon WY
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(1):111-123. PubMed ID: 26881877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive Designs for Non-inferiority Trials with Multiple Experimental Treatments.
    Xu W; Hu F; Cheung SH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):3255-3270. PubMed ID: 29298617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response-adaptive randomization for clinical trials with continuous outcomes.
    Zhang L; Rosenberger WF
    Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):562-9. PubMed ID: 16918921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian adaptive biased-coin designs for clinical trials with normal responses.
    Atkinson AC; Biswas A
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 15737084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response adaptive designs with a variance-penalized criterion.
    Yi Y; Wang X
    Biom J; 2009 Oct; 51(5):763-73. PubMed ID: 19757432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multi-treatment response adaptive design for ordinal categorical responses.
    Biswas A; Bhattacharya R; Das S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Mar; 29(3):827-836. PubMed ID: 31072189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Balancing statistical and ethical considerations in planning clinical trials: recommendations for response-adaptive randomization urn designs.
    Piccorelli AV; Fraker SA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1105-1118. PubMed ID: 29442610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A practical response adaptive block randomization (RABR) design with analytic type I error protection.
    Zhan T; Cui L; Geng Z; Zhang L; Gu Y; Chan ISF
    Stat Med; 2021 Oct; 40(23):4947-4960. PubMed ID: 34111902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive biased-coin designs for skewing the allocation proportion in clinical trials with normal responses.
    Atkinson AC; Biswas A
    Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(16):2477-92. PubMed ID: 16007571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pairwise comparisons with ordered categorical data.
    Lin Y; Cheung SH; Poon WY; Lu TY
    Stat Med; 2013 Aug; 32(18):3192-205. PubMed ID: 23386287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Higher order response adaptive urn designs for clinical trials with highly successful treatments.
    Ivanova A; Hoberman S
    J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat; 2015 Jan; 64(1):175-189. PubMed ID: 25641991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.