399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30841805)
1. Risk of concussion due to head acceleration in rear impact sled tests of passenger automobile seats.
Courtney A; Campbell IC; Courtney E; Pasquesi SA
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S133-S135. PubMed ID: 30841805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. BioRID dummy responses in matched ABTS and conventional seat tests on the IIHS rear sled.
Viano DC; Parenteau CS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 12(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 21823942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions.
Williams JR; O'Donel CA; Leiss PJ
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S16-23. PubMed ID: 26436226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Occupant responses in conventional and ABTS seats in high-speed rear sled tests.
Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R; Prasad P
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 28678610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of car seats in low speed rear-end impacts using the BioRID dummy and the new neck injury criterion (NIC).
Boström O; Fredriksson R; Håland Y; Jakobsson L; Krafft M; Lövsund P; Muser MH; Svensson MY
Accid Anal Prev; 2000 Mar; 32(2):321-8. PubMed ID: 10688488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Average male and female virtual dummy model (BioRID and EvaRID) simulations with two seat concepts in the Euro NCAP low severity rear impact test configuration.
Linder A; Holmqvist K; Svensson MY
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():62-70. PubMed ID: 28622848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative performance of forward-facing child restraint systems on the C/FMVSS 213 bench and vehicle seats.
Maltese MR; Tylko S; Belwadi A; Locey C; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S103-10. PubMed ID: 25307374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of anti-whiplash seats during low/moderate speed rear-end collisions.
Mang DWH; Siegmund GP; Blouin JS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 32027520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Responses of the Q6/Q6s ATD Positioned in Booster Seats in the Far-Side Seat Location of Side Impact Passenger Car and Sled Tests.
Tylko S; Bohman K; Bussières A
Stapp Car Crash J; 2015 Nov; 59():313-35. PubMed ID: 26660749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rebound after rear impacts.
Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 23343027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Thoracic and lumbar spine responses in high-speed rear sled tests.
Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jul; 19(5):523-528. PubMed ID: 29494309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Head trajectories of restrained child dummy in sled tests over 56 kph delta-v.
Hauschild HW
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2000; 44():299-308. PubMed ID: 11558089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Parameter study for child injury mitigation in near-side impacts through FE simulations.
Andersson M; Pipkorn B; Lövsund P
Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(2):182-92. PubMed ID: 22458797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Protection of children in forward-facing child restraint systems during oblique side impact sled tests: Intrusion and tether effects.
Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Kim J; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():156-62. PubMed ID: 27586117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Difference in dummy responses in matched side impact tests of vehicles with and without side airbags.
Viano DC; Parenteau CS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 26700934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental injury study of children seated behind collapsing front seats in rear impacts.
Saczalski KJ; Sances A; Kumaresan S; Burton JL; Lewis PR
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():259-65. PubMed ID: 12724904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. IIHS head restraint ratings and insurance injury claim rates.
Trempel RE; Zuby DS; Edwards MA
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Aug; 17(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 26765782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Second-row occupant responses with and without intrusion in rear sled and crash tests.
Parenteau CS; Viano DC; Burnett R
Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 33289580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of belt pretensioning on dummy responses in 40 km/h rear-impact sled tests.
Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 22239146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frontal-oblique impact sled tests of a rearward-facing child restraint system with and without a support leg.
Patton DA; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107137. PubMed ID: 37295359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
