BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30841850)

  • 1. Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review.
    Superchi C; González JA; Solà I; Cobo E; Hren D; Boutron I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):48. PubMed ID: 30841850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
    Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of ARCADIA: a tool for assessing the quality of peer-review reports in biomedical research.
    Superchi C; Hren D; Blanco D; Rius R; Recchioni A; Boutron I; González JA
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jun; 10(6):e035604. PubMed ID: 32518211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bruce R; Chauvin A; Trinquart L; Ravaud P; Boutron I
    BMC Med; 2016 Jun; 14(1):85. PubMed ID: 27287500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials.
    Chauvin A; Moher D; Altman D; Schriger DL; Alam S; Hopewell S; Shanahan DR; Recchioni A; Ravaud P; Boutron I
    BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e017462. PubMed ID: 28918414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
    Walters SJ; Stern C; Robertson-Malt S
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):138-97. PubMed ID: 27532315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How is AMSTAR applied by authors - a call for better reporting.
    Pieper D; Koensgen N; Breuing J; Ge L; Wegewitz U
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):56. PubMed ID: 29914386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The application of health literacy measurement tools (collective or individual domains) in assessing chronic disease management: a systematic review protocol.
    Shum J; Poureslami I; Doyle-Waters MM; FitzGerald JM
    Syst Rev; 2016 Jun; 5():97. PubMed ID: 27267468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study.
    Chauvin A; Ravaud P; Moher D; Schriger D; Hopewell S; Shanahan D; Alam S; Baron G; Regnaux JP; Crequit P; Martinez V; Riveros C; Le Cleach L; Recchioni A; Altman DG; Boutron I
    BMC Med; 2019 Nov; 17(1):205. PubMed ID: 31744489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodological quality of randomized controlled trials of postoperative epidural analgesia: validation of the Epidural Analgesia Trial Checklist as a specific instrument to evaluate methodology.
    Liu SS; Togioka BM; Hurley RW; Vu CM; Hanna MN; Murphy JD; Wu CL
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2010; 35(6):549-55. PubMed ID: 20975473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research.
    Li G; Abbade LPF; Nwosu I; Jin Y; Leenus A; Maaz M; Wang M; Bhatt M; Zielinski L; Sanger N; Bantoto B; Luo C; Shams I; Shahid H; Chang Y; Sun G; Mbuagbaw L; Samaan Z; Levine MAH; Adachi JD; Thabane L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jan; 18(1):9. PubMed ID: 29325533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.
    Philips Z; Ginnelly L; Sculpher M; Claxton K; Golder S; Riemsma R; Woolacoot N; Glanville J
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Sep; 8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. PubMed ID: 15361314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
    Jadad AR; Moore RA; Carroll D; Jenkinson C; Reynolds DJ; Gavaghan DJ; McQuay HJ
    Control Clin Trials; 1996 Feb; 17(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 8721797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].
    Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Designs of trials assessing interventions to improve the peer review process: a vignette-based survey.
    Heim A; Ravaud P; Baron G; Boutron I
    BMC Med; 2018 Oct; 16(1):191. PubMed ID: 30318018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nature and reporting characteristics of UK health technology assessment systematic reviews.
    Carroll C; Kaltenthaler E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):35. PubMed ID: 29739352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of methodologic quality of randomized trials of interventional techniques: development of an interventional pain management specific instrument.
    Manchikanti L; Hirsch JA; Cohen SP; Heavner JE; Falco FJ; Diwan S; Boswell MV; Candido KD; Onyewu CO; Zhu J; Sehgal N; Kaye AD; Benyamin RM; Helm S; Singh V; Datta S; Abdi S; Christo PJ; Hameed H; Hameed M; Vallejo R; Pampati V; Racz GB; Raj PP
    Pain Physician; 2014; 17(3):E263-90. PubMed ID: 24850111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Structure of Research Questions in Randomized Controlled Trials in the Rehabilitation Field: A Methodological Study.
    Arienti C; Lazzarini SG; Patrini M; Puljak L; Pollock A; Negrini S
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 100(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 33031109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Study Designs and Sources of Error in Medical Research.
    Kacha AK; Nizamuddin SL; Nizamuddin J; Ramakrishna H; Shahul SS
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2018 Dec; 32(6):2789-2801. PubMed ID: 29571641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.