These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30842066)

  • 1. Perfect Top of the Evidence Hierarchy Pyramid, Maybe Not So Perfect: lessons learned by a novice researcher engaging in a meta-analysis project.
    Herner M
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2019 Aug; 24(4):130-132. PubMed ID: 30842066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noblesse oblige: critical issues at the highest level of clinical evidence.
    Knottnerus JA; Tugwell P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():vi-viii. PubMed ID: 30654870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-analysis: mistake or milestone in medicine?
    Foroutan F; Guyatt G; Alba AC; Ross H
    Heart; 2018 Oct; 104(19):1559-1561. PubMed ID: 29602884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can systematic reviews with sparse data be trusted?
    Afshari A; Wetterslev J; Smith AF
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Jan; 72(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 27804113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic review and meta-analysis as tools for evidence-based medicine.
    Iniesta-Sepúlveda M; Ríos A
    Cir Esp (Engl Ed); 2024 Jun; 102(6):336-337. PubMed ID: 38697351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of systematic review and meta-analysis in modern cytopathology.
    Trimboli P; Treglia G; Giovanella L; Bongiovanni M
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Feb; 128(2):89-91. PubMed ID: 31381260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: black boxes of medical literature?
    Heilmann C; Blümle A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Dec; 48(6):807-8. PubMed ID: 26374870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Review of mixed treatment comparisons in published systematic reviews shows marked increase since 2009.
    Lee AW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 67(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 24090930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders.
    van Tulder MW; Assendelft WJ; Koes BW; Bouter LM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Oct; 22(20):2323-30. PubMed ID: 9355211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of therapeutic safety in systematic reviews: literature review.
    Ernst E; Pittler MH
    BMJ; 2001 Sep; 323(7312):546. PubMed ID: 11546700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. WHO leads global effort on systematic reviews.
    Villar J; Betrán AP; Gülmezoglu AM; Say L
    Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 32(1):164-5. PubMed ID: 12690032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Paul M; Leeflang MM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2021 Mar; 27(3):311-314. PubMed ID: 33217559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Primer on Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
    Nguyen NH; Singh S
    Semin Liver Dis; 2018 May; 38(2):103-111. PubMed ID: 29871017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-Synthesis Tools to Inform Evidence-Based Physiatry.
    Patrick Engkasan J; Rizzo JR; Levack W; Annaswamy TM
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Nov; 99(11):1072-1073. PubMed ID: 32576745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based urology in practice: heterogeneity in a systematic review meta-analysis.
    Imamura M; Cook J; Maclennan S; N'dow J; Dahm P;
    BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(6):770-3. PubMed ID: 20067453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research Pearls: The Significance of Statistics and Perils of Pooling. Part 3: Pearls and Pitfalls of Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews.
    Harris JD; Brand JC; Cote MP; Dhawan A
    Arthroscopy; 2017 Aug; 33(8):1594-1602. PubMed ID: 28457677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cochrane Reviews: Four Proposals for Improvement.
    Currow DC; Higginson IJ
    J Palliat Med; 2015 Nov; 18(11):906-7. PubMed ID: 26431264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence-based medicine: revisiting the pyramid of priorities.
    Rosner AL
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2012 Jan; 16(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 22196426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking.
    Fox ZE; Williams AM; Blasingame MN; Koonce TY; Kusnoor SV; Su J; Lee P; Epelbaum MI; Naylor HM; DesAutels SJ; Frakes ET; Giuse NB
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2019 Oct; 107(4):613-617. PubMed ID: 31607825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.