224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30843008)
21. [Characterization of sonographically detected breast lesions using three-dimensional data sets].
Fischer T; Filimonow S; Hamm B; Slowinski T; Thomas A
Rofo; 2006 Dec; 178(12):1224-34. PubMed ID: 17136646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Breast cancer detection using single-reading of breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) compared to double-reading of 2D-mammography: Evidence from a population-based trial.
Houssami N; Bernardi D; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Macaskill P
Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 47():94-99. PubMed ID: 28192742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Macaskill P
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jun; 14(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 23623721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis on assessment of the lesions in dense breast: a preliminary study].
Li Y; Ye ZX; Wu T; An YH; Liu PF; Bao RX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 35(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 23648297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of integrating 3D-mammography (digital breast tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography on radiologists' true-positive and false-positive detection in a population breast screening trial.
Bernardi D; Caumo F; Macaskill P; Ciatto S; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
Eur J Cancer; 2014 May; 50(7):1232-8. PubMed ID: 24582915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The simulation of 3D mass models in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; De Keyzer F; Bosmans H; Dance DR; Young KC; Van Ongeval C
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081913. PubMed ID: 25086544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Emerging technologies in breast cancer detection.
Smith AP; Hall PA; Marcello DM
Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(4):16-24; quiz 25-7. PubMed ID: 15377106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. 3D tomosynthesis evaluation of breast parenchymal density and its association with malignant lesions and menopausal status.
Pires T; Rohini A
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2024 Jun; 55(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 38402135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessing tumor extent on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus full-field digital mammography and ultrasound.
Patel BK; Garza SA; Eversman S; Lopez-Alvarez Y; Kosiorek H; Pockaj BA
Clin Imaging; 2017; 46():78-84. PubMed ID: 28750354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Rapid review: Estimates of incremental breast cancer detection from tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening in women with dense breasts.
Houssami N; Turner RM
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():141-145. PubMed ID: 27721194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and ultrasound: which should be used for the different breast densities in breast cancer screening?
Starikov A; Drotman M; Hentel K; Katzen J; Min RJ; Arleo EK
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 26549432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.
Peters S; Hellmich M; Stork A; Kemper J; Grinstein O; Püsken M; Stahlhut L; Kinner S; Maintz D; Krug KB
Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study.
Bernardi D; Macaskill P; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Houssami N
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Aug; 17(8):1105-1113. PubMed ID: 27345635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in ultrasonography-detected breast cancers.
Nam KJ; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Ko EY; Jeong DW; Choo KS
Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):649-55. PubMed ID: 26292782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound: Additional roles in dense breasts with category 0 at conventional digital mammography.
Lee WK; Chung J; Cha ES; Lee JE; Kim JH
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):291-296. PubMed ID: 26499000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
