These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30843251)
1. Confidence intervals for the difference in the success rates of two treatments in the analysis of correlated binary responses. Saha KK; Wang S Biom J; 2019 Jul; 61(4):983-1002. PubMed ID: 30843251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome. Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Approximate simultaneous confidence intervals for multiple contrasts of binomial proportions. Schaarschmidt F; Sill M; Hothorn LA Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):782-92. PubMed ID: 18932137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparison of Some Approximate Confidence Intervals for a Single Proportion for Clustered Binary Outcome Data. Saha KK; Miller D; Wang S Int J Biostat; 2016 Nov; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 26569139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Confidence-interval construction for rate ratio in matched-pair studies with incomplete data. Li HQ; Chan IS; Tang ML; Tian GL; Tang NS J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):546-68. PubMed ID: 24697611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Confidence interval estimation of the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary outcome data. Zou G; Donner A Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):807-11. PubMed ID: 15339305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exact statistical inference for group sequential trials. Lin DY; Wei LJ; DeMets DL Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1399-408. PubMed ID: 1786325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies. Tang ML; Tang NS; Chan IS Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3565-79. PubMed ID: 16261646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of a parameter and its exact confidence interval following sequential sample size reestimation trials. Cheng Y; Shen Y Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):910-8. PubMed ID: 15606411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel nonparametric confidence interval for differences of proportions for correlated binary data. Duan C; Cao Y; Zhou L; Tan MT; Chen P Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2249-2263. PubMed ID: 27856961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Asymptotic simultaneous confidence intervals for many-to-one comparisons of binary proportions in randomized clinical trials. Schaarschmidt F; Biesheuvel E; Hothorn LA J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(2):292-310. PubMed ID: 19212881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accurate confidence intervals for proportion in studies with clustered binary outcome. Shan G Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Oct; 29(10):3006-3018. PubMed ID: 32242483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Confidence intervals for the common intraclass correlation in the analysis of clustered binary responses. Saha KK; Wang S J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(4):682-697. PubMed ID: 28992422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interval estimation of the mean difference in the analysis of over-dispersed count data. Saha KK Biom J; 2013 Jan; 55(1):114-33. PubMed ID: 23225642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Confidence intervals based on some weighting functions for the difference of two binomial proportions. Maruo K; Kawai N Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(13):2288-96. PubMed ID: 24644149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Test-based exact confidence intervals for the difference of two binomial proportions. Chan IS; Zhang Z Biometrics; 1999 Dec; 55(4):1202-9. PubMed ID: 11315068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Power and sample size estimation for the clustered wilcoxon test. Rosner B; Glynn RJ Biometrics; 2011 Jun; 67(2):646-53. PubMed ID: 20880011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Planning a reproducibility study: how many subjects and how many replicates per subject for an expected width of the 95 per cent confidence interval of the intraclass correlation coefficient. Giraudeau B; Mary JY Stat Med; 2001 Nov; 20(21):3205-14. PubMed ID: 11746313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Small-sample performance of the robust score test and its modifications in generalized estimating equations. Guo X; Pan W; Connett JE; Hannan PJ; French SA Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3479-95. PubMed ID: 15977302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis using generalised heterogeneity statistics: should we use unequal tails? Jackson D; Bowden J BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Sep; 16(1):118. PubMed ID: 27604952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]