These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30843467)

  • 21. Replication crisis = trust crisis? The effect of successful vs failed replications on laypeople's trust in researchers and research.
    Hendriks F; Kienhues D; Bromme R
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Apr; 29(3):270-288. PubMed ID: 32036741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Transparent communication of evidence does not undermine public trust in evidence.
    Kerr JR; Schneider CR; Freeman ALJ; Marteau T; van der Linden S
    PNAS Nexus; 2022 Nov; 1(5):pgac280. PubMed ID: 36712327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Indicators of trustworthiness in lay-friendly research summaries: Scientificness surpasses easiness.
    Jonas M; Kerwer M; Chasiotis A; Rosman T
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 Jan; 33(1):37-57. PubMed ID: 37278009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Learning about faces: effects of trustworthiness on affective evaluation.
    Aguado L; Román FJ; Fernández-Cahill M; Diéguez-Risco T; Romero-Ferreiro V
    Span J Psychol; 2011 Nov; 14(2):523-34. PubMed ID: 22059299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The credibility of scientific communication sources regarding climate change: A population-based survey experiment.
    Sanz-Menéndez L; Cruz-Castro L
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Jul; 28(5):534-553. PubMed ID: 30995158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.
    Picardi N
    Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():1-3. PubMed ID: 28474609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Believing in Expertise: How Authors' Credentials and Language Use Influence the Credibility of Online Health Information.
    Thon FM; Jucks R
    Health Commun; 2017 Jul; 32(7):828-836. PubMed ID: 27466693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do We Trust the Crowd? Effects of Crowdsourcing on Perceived Credibility of Online Health Information.
    Huang Y; Sundar SS
    Health Commun; 2022 Jan; 37(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 32962437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Balance as Credibility? How Presenting One- vs. Two-Sided Messages Affects Ratings of Scientists' and Politicians' Trustworthiness.
    Hendriks F; Janssen I; Jucks R
    Health Commun; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2757-2764. PubMed ID: 35980101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can you believe it? An investigation into the impact of retraction source credibility on the continued influence effect.
    Ecker UKH; Antonio LM
    Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):631-644. PubMed ID: 33452666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Beware of vested interests: Epistemic vigilance improves reasoning about scientific evidence (for some people).
    Gierth L; Bromme R
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231387. PubMed ID: 32294109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evoking vigilance: Would you (dis)trust a scientist who discusses ethical implications of research in a science blog?
    Hendriks F; Kienhues D; Bromme R
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Nov; 25(8):992-1008. PubMed ID: 27150266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Abortion Web Ecosystem: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Trustworthiness and Bias.
    Han L; Boniface ER; Han LY; Albright J; Doty N; Darney BG
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Oct; 22(10):e20619. PubMed ID: 33104002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of source expertise and trustworthiness on recollection: the case of vaccine misinformation.
    Pluviano S; Della Sala S; Watt C
    Cogn Process; 2020 Aug; 21(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 32333126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Trusting scientific experts in an online world.
    Boyd K
    Synthese; 2022; 200(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 35194259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Individual Uncertainty and the Uncertainty of Science: The Impact of Perceived Conflict and General Self-Efficacy on the Perception of Tentativeness and Credibility of Scientific Information.
    Flemming D; Feinkohl I; Cress U; Kimmerle J
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1859. PubMed ID: 26648902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Testing how different narrative perspectives achieve communication objectives and goals in online natural science videos.
    Ruzi SA; Lee NM; Smith AA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0257866. PubMed ID: 34644325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing YouTube science news' credibility: The impact of web-search on the role of video, source, and user attributes.
    Michalovich A; Hershkovitz A
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 May; 29(4):376-391. PubMed ID: 32072863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Communicating trust and trustworthiness through scientists' biographies: Benevolence beliefs.
    Hautea S; Besley JC; Choung H
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 Feb; ():9636625241228733. PubMed ID: 38369706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of Public Perception of the Israeli Government's Early Emergency Instructions Regarding COVID-19: Online Survey Study.
    Gesser-Edelsburg A; Cohen R; Hijazi R; Abed Elhadi Shahbari N
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 May; 22(5):e19370. PubMed ID: 32392172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.