These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30844314)

  • 1. Stimulus-Response and Response-Effect Compatibility With Touchless Gestures and Moving Action Effects.
    Janczyk M; Xiong A; Proctor RW
    Hum Factors; 2019 Dec; 61(8):1297-1314. PubMed ID: 30844314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Compatibility effects with touchless gestures.
    Janczyk M
    Exp Brain Res; 2023 Mar; 241(3):743-752. PubMed ID: 36720746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response-effect compatibility defines the natural scrolling direction.
    Chen J; Proctor RW
    Hum Factors; 2013 Dec; 55(6):1112-29. PubMed ID: 24745203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What triggers a gesture? Exploring affordance compatibility effects in representational gesture production.
    Masson-Carro I; Goudbeek M; Krahmer E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1164-1182. PubMed ID: 32658540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial S-R compatibility: positional instruction vs. compatibility instruction.
    Heister G; Schroeder-Heister P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1994 Feb; 85(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 8165921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developing a 3D Gestural Interface for Anesthesia-Related Human-Computer Interaction Tasks Using Both Experts and Novices.
    Jurewicz KA; Neyens DM; Catchpole K; Reeves ST
    Hum Factors; 2018 Nov; 60(7):992-1007. PubMed ID: 29906400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Separating the effects of stimulus-gravity compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on visuomotor synchronization.
    Zhou L; Shangguan M; Xing L; Yu H; Wang H; Hove MJ; Li S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Apr; 46(4):405-415. PubMed ID: 32223292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choice and stimulus-response compatibility affect duration of response selection.
    Dassonville P; Lewis SM; Foster HE; Ashe J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1999 Jan; 7(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 9838139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining the Usability of Touch Screen Gestures for Older and Younger Adults.
    Gao Q; Sun Q
    Hum Factors; 2015 Aug; 57(5):835-63. PubMed ID: 25957042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Naïve and experienced judgments of stimulus-response compatibility: implications for interface design.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Ergonomics; 2003 Jan; 46(1-3):169-87. PubMed ID: 12554405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age and gestural differences in the ease of rotating a virtual 3D image on a large, multi-touch screen.
    Ku CJ; Chen LC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Apr; 116(2):382-405. PubMed ID: 24032318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complementary Hand Responses Occur in Both Peri- and Extrapersonal Space.
    Faber TW; van Elk M; Jonas KJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0154457. PubMed ID: 27120470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Touchless computer interfaces in hospitals: A review.
    Cronin S; Doherty G
    Health Informatics J; 2019 Dec; 25(4):1325-1342. PubMed ID: 29431017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Control-display alignment determines the prevalent compatibility effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response tasks.
    Lee S; Miles JD; Vu KP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 26169949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the utility of 3D hand cursors to explore medical volume datasets with a touchless interface.
    Lopes DS; Parreira PDF; Paulo SF; Nunes V; Rego PA; Neves MC; Rodrigues PS; Jorge JA
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 Aug; 72():140-149. PubMed ID: 28720438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Touchless interaction with software in interventional radiology and surgery: a systematic literature review.
    Mewes A; Hensen B; Wacker F; Hansen C
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Feb; 12(2):291-305. PubMed ID: 27647327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interaction in planning movement direction for articulatory gestures and manual actions.
    Vainio L; Tiainen M; Tiippana K; Komeilipoor N; Vainio M
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 233(10):2951-9. PubMed ID: 26126804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Atypical biological kinematics are represented during observational practice.
    Foster NC; Bennett SJ; Causer J; Bird G; Andrew M; Hayes SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jun; 44(6):842-847. PubMed ID: 29809051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action.
    Couth S; Gowen E; Poliakoff E
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 232(3):855-64. PubMed ID: 24337351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finger Gesture Spotting from Long Sequences Based on Multi-Stream Recurrent Neural Networks.
    Benitez-Garcia G; Haris M; Tsuda Y; Ukita N
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jan; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 31963623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.