These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. The correlation between synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions in Drosophila: mutation, selection or relaxed constraints? Comeron JM; Kreitman M Genetics; 1998 Oct; 150(2):767-75. PubMed ID: 9755207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Not so different after all: a comparison of methods for detecting amino acid sites under selection. Kosakovsky Pond SL; Frost SD Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1208-22. PubMed ID: 15703242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved inference of site-specific positive selection under a generalized parametric codon model when there are multinucleotide mutations and multiple nonsynonymous rates. Dunn KA; Kenney T; Gu H; Bielawski JP BMC Evol Biol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):22. PubMed ID: 30642241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards realistic codon models: among site variability and dependency of synonymous and non-synonymous rates. Mayrose I; Doron-Faigenboim A; Bacharach E; Pupko T Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i319-27. PubMed ID: 17646313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Codon Usage Selection Can Bias Estimation of the Fraction of Adaptive Amino Acid Fixations. Matsumoto T; John A; Baeza-Centurion P; Li B; Akashi H Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Jun; 33(6):1580-9. PubMed ID: 26873577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A codon model of nucleotide substitution with selection on synonymous codon usage. Kubatko L; Shah P; Herbei R; Gilchrist MA Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):290-7. PubMed ID: 26358614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nonsynonymous, synonymous and nonsense mutations in human cancer-related genes undergo stronger purifying selections than expectation. Chu D; Wei L BMC Cancer; 2019 Apr; 19(1):359. PubMed ID: 30991970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recent and Long-Term Selection Across Synonymous Sites in Drosophila ananassae. Choi JY; Aquadro CF J Mol Evol; 2016 Aug; 83(1-2):50-60. PubMed ID: 27481397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Substitution rates in Drosophila nuclear genes: implications for translational selection. Dunn KA; Bielawski JP; Yang Z Genetics; 2001 Jan; 157(1):295-305. PubMed ID: 11139510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nucleic acid composition, codon usage, and the rate of synonymous substitution in protein-coding genes. Ticher A; Graur D J Mol Evol; 1989 Apr; 28(4):286-98. PubMed ID: 2499685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Large-scale analyses of synonymous substitution rates can be sensitive to assumptions about the process of mutation. Aris-Brosou S; Bielawski JP Gene; 2006 Aug; 378():58-64. PubMed ID: 16797879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inferring natural selection operating on conservative and radical substitution at single amino acid sites. Suzuki Y Genes Genet Syst; 2007 Aug; 82(4):341-60. PubMed ID: 17895585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evolutionary models accounting for layers of selection in protein-coding genes and their impact on the inference of positive selection. Rubinstein ND; Doron-Faigenboim A; Mayrose I; Pupko T Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Dec; 28(12):3297-308. PubMed ID: 21690564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evolutionary Shortcuts via Multinucleotide Substitutions and Their Impact on Natural Selection Analyses. Lucaci AG; Zehr JD; Enard D; Thornton JW; Kosakovsky Pond SL Mol Biol Evol; 2023 Jul; 40(7):. PubMed ID: 37395787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]