469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30847524)
1. The Impact of Circular Stapler Size on the Incidence of Cervical Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy.
Hosoi T; Abe T; Uemura N; Higaki E; Kawai R; Kawakami J; An B; Nagino M; Shimizu Y
World J Surg; 2019 Jul; 43(7):1746-1755. PubMed ID: 30847524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of a Long Linear Staplers on the Incidence of Stricture after Triangulating Esophagogastric Anastomosis.
Toyota S; Kimura Y; Jogo T; Hu Q; Hokonohara K; Nakanishi R; Hisamatsu Y; Ando K; Oki E; Mori M
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2021 Jan; 31(4):453-456. PubMed ID: 33492082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Which Anastomotic Techniques Is the Best Choice for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.
Chen B; Xia P; Tang W; Huang S
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Feb; 27(2):422-432. PubMed ID: 36417036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of cervical end-to-side triangulating esophagogastric anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Nakata K; Nagai E; Ohuchida K; Nakamura K; Tanaka M
World J Surg; 2015 May; 39(5):1099-104. PubMed ID: 25582767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Does circular stapled esophagogastric anastomotic size affect the incidence of postoperative strictures?
Yendamuri S; Gutierrez L; Oni A; Mashtare T; Khushalani N; Yang G; Nava H; Demmy T; Nwogu C
J Surg Res; 2011 Jan; 165(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 21067773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk Factors of Anastomosis Stricture After Esophagectomy and the Impact of Anastomosis Technique.
Na B; Kang CH; Na KJ; Park S; Park IK; Kim YT
Ann Thorac Surg; 2023 May; 115(5):1257-1264. PubMed ID: 36739069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler.
Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Uzun E; Berlth F; Staubitz J; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2242-2249. PubMed ID: 33506342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Totally Mechanical Collard Technique for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Stricture Formation Compared with Circular Stapled Anastomosis.
Hirano Y; Fujita T; Sato K; Kurita D; Sato T; Ishiyama K; Fujiwara H; Oguma J; Daiko H
World J Surg; 2020 Dec; 44(12):4175-4183. PubMed ID: 32783124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Circular Stapler Method for Avoiding Stricture of Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis.
Shiraishi O; Yasuda T; Kato H; Momose K; Hiraki Y; Yasuda A; Shinkai M; Imano M
J Gastrointest Surg; 2022 Apr; 26(4):725-732. PubMed ID: 35138510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Modified application of circular stapler to cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
Yan M; Chen YH; Liu XB; Shao LF; Li Y
Ai Zheng; 2009 Jul; 28(7):768-70. PubMed ID: 19624907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anastomotic stricture after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: An evaluation of incidence, risk factors, and treatment.
Koshy RM; Brown JM; Chmelo J; Watkinson T; Phillips AW
Surgery; 2022 Feb; 171(2):393-398. PubMed ID: 34482991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Application of gastroepiploic tunnel esophagogastrostomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
Zhou L; Ge P; Chen J; Wang J; Wang M; Li X; Jiang T
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):1021-1024. PubMed ID: 27680071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Circular Stapled Technique Versus Modified Collard Technique for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis After Esophagectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Hosoi T; Abe T; Higaki E; Fujieda H; Nagao T; Ito S; Komori K; Iwase M; Oze I; Shimizu Y
Ann Surg; 2022 Jul; 276(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 34417369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Circular-stapled esophagogastrostomy using the keyhole procedure after radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Goto A; Tanaka T; Shibasaki S; Nakauchi M; Nakamura K; Akimoto S; Kikuchi K; Inaba K; Uyama I; Suda K
Esophagus; 2023 Jan; 20(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 36042126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
