193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30847589)
1. Correlation between MRI phenotypes and a genomic classifier of prostate cancer: preliminary findings.
Purysko AS; Magi-Galluzzi C; Mian OY; Sittenfeld S; Davicioni E; du Plessis M; Buerki C; Bullen J; Li L; Madabhushi A; Stephenson A; Klein EA
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4861-4870. PubMed ID: 30847589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transcriptome Wide Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy and Matching Surgical Specimens from High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: The Target Must Be Hit.
Radtke JP; Takhar M; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Erho N; du Plessis M; Buerki C; Ong K; Davicioni E; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Jul; 4(4):540-546. PubMed ID: 28753844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.
Schaudinn A; Gawlitza J; Mucha S; Linder N; Franz T; Horn LC; Kahn T; Busse H
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():180-185. PubMed ID: 31153562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier Relates More Strongly to Gleason Grade Group Than Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies.
Martin DT; Ghabili K; Levi A; Humphrey PA; Sprenkle PC
Urology; 2019 Mar; 125():64-72. PubMed ID: 30552940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of observation size and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in PI-RADS v2.1 assessment category 4 and 5 observations compared to adverse pathological outcomes.
Abreu-Gomez J; Walker D; Alotaibi T; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Schieda N
Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4251-4261. PubMed ID: 32211965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy.
Taghipour M; Ziaei A; Alessandrino F; Hassanzadeh E; Harisinghani M; Vangel M; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Apr; 44(4):1520-1527. PubMed ID: 30361870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization and PI-RADS version 2 assessment of prostate cancers missed by prebiopsy 3-T multiparametric MRI: Correlation with whole-mount thin-section histopathology.
Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Cho KS
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():174-180. PubMed ID: 30908991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The combination of prostate MRI PI-RADS scoring system and a genomic classifier is associated with pelvic lymph node metastasis at the time of radical prostatectomy.
Benidir T; Lone Z; Nguyen JK; Ward R; Hofmann M; Klein EA; Mian OY; Weight CJ; Purysko AS
Br J Radiol; 2023 Mar; 96(1144):20220663. PubMed ID: 36745009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low PI-RADS assessment category excludes extraprostatic extension (≥pT3a) of prostate cancer: a histology-validated study including 301 operated patients.
Alessi S; Pricolo P; Summers P; Femia M; Tagliabue E; Renne G; Bianchi R; Musi G; De Cobelli O; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Bellomi M; Petralia G
Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5478-5487. PubMed ID: 30887199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.
Zhai L; Fan Y; Sun S; Wang H; Meng Y; Hu S; Wang X; Yu W; Jin J
Scand J Urol; 2018; 52(5-6):333-339. PubMed ID: 30895901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biparametric Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.
Takeuchi N; Sakamoto S; Nishiyama A; Horikoshi T; Yamada Y; Iizuka J; Maimaiti M; Imamura Y; Kawamura K; Imamoto T; Komiya A; Ikehara Y; Akakura K; Ichikawa T
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):e817-e829. PubMed ID: 29576444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of PI-RADS 2, ADC histogram-derived parameters, and their combination for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer.
Lin WC; Westphalen AC; Silva GE; Chodraui Filho S; Reis RB; Muglia VF
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Nov; 41(11):2209-2217. PubMed ID: 27364781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 improve accuracy in reporting anterior lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)?
Hoffmann R; Logan C; O'Callaghan M; Gormly K; Chan K; Foreman D
Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Jan; 50(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 29188489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of relationships between the final Gleason score, PI-RADS v2 score, ADC value, PSA level, and tumor diameter in patients that underwent radical prostatectomy due to prostate cancer.
Gündoğdu E; Emekli E; Kebapçı M
Radiol Med; 2020 Sep; 125(9):827-837. PubMed ID: 32266690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of PI-RADS version 1 versus version 2 regarding the relation with histopathological results.
Auer T; Edlinger M; Bektic J; Nagele U; Herrmann T; Schäfer G; Aigner F; Junker D
World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):687-693. PubMed ID: 27510762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS v2): Interobserver Agreement and Positive Predictive Value for Localization of Intermediate- and High-Grade Prostate Cancers on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Chen F; Cen S; Palmer S
Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28546032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tumor localization by Prostate Imaging and Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 predicts prognosis of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Fujimoto A; Sakamoto S; Horikoshi T; Zhao X; Yamada Y; Rii J; Takeuchi N; Imamura Y; Sazuka T; Matsusaka K; Ikeda JI; Ichikawa T
Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):10079. PubMed ID: 37344491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tissue-based Genomics Augments Post-prostatectomy Risk Stratification in a Natural History Cohort of Intermediate- and High-Risk Men.
Ross AE; Johnson MH; Yousefi K; Davicioni E; Netto GJ; Marchionni L; Fedor HL; Glavaris S; Choeurng V; Buerki C; Erho N; Lam LL; Humphreys EB; Faraj S; Bezerra SM; Han M; Partin AW; Trock BJ; Schaeffer EM
Eur Urol; 2016 Jan; 69(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 26058959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A genomic classifier improves prediction of metastatic disease within 5 years after surgery in node-negative high-risk prostate cancer patients managed by radical prostatectomy without adjuvant therapy.
Klein EA; Yousefi K; Haddad Z; Choeurng V; Buerki C; Stephenson AJ; Li J; Kattan MW; Magi-Galluzzi C; Davicioni E
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):778-86. PubMed ID: 25466945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Implications of PI-RADS Version 1 and Updated Version 2 on the Scoring of Prostatic Lesions in Multiparametric MRI].
Haas M; Günzel K; Penzkofer T; Maxeiner A; Fischer T; Miller K; Hamm B; Asbach P; Cash H
Aktuelle Urol; 2016 Sep; 47(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 27680189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
