BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30847589)

  • 21. Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
    Kasel-Seibert M; Lehmann T; Aschenbach R; Guettler FV; Abubrig M; Grimm MO; Teichgraeber U; Franiel T
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 26971415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pre-biopsy 3-Tesla MRI and targeted biopsy of the index prostate cancer: correlation with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Patel U; Dasgupta P; Challacombe B; Cahill D; Brown C; Patel R; Kirby R
    BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 27153933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].
    Zuo MZ; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Zhang CY; Wen R; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Wu JF; Li X; Shen JK
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 97(47):3693-3698. PubMed ID: 29325321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinically insignificant prostate cancer suitable for active surveillance according to Prostate Cancer Research International: Active surveillance criteria: Utility of PI-RADS v2.
    Yim JH; Kim CK; Kim JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1072-1079. PubMed ID: 28901655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. PI-RADS version 2 for prediction of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy: a preliminary study in patients with biopsy-proven Gleason Score 7 (3+4) prostate cancer.
    Woo S; Kim SY; Lee J; Kim SH; Cho JY
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3580-7. PubMed ID: 26847042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Sufficiently Discovering Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer? Per-Lesion Radiology-Pathology Correlation Study.
    Lee MS; Moon MH; Kim YA; Sung CK; Woo H; Jeong H; Son H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jul; 211(1):114-120. PubMed ID: 29702017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prostate MRI evolution in clinical practice: Audit of tumour detection and staging versus prostatectomy with staged introduction of multiparametric MRI and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v2 reporting.
    Raeside M; Low A; Cohen P; Sutherland P; Gormly K
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 63(4):487-494. PubMed ID: 30951248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of multiparametric MR imaging with PI-RADS V2 assessment in detecting infiltration of the neurovascular bundles prior to prostatectomy.
    Sauer M; Weinrich JM; Fraune C; Salomon G; Tennstedt P; Adam G; Beyersdorff D
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():187-192. PubMed ID: 29279161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with PI-RADS version 2 in prostate cancers: initial results.
    Park SY; Oh YT; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Rha KH; Hong SJ
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Aug; 26(8):2502-9. PubMed ID: 26560721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.
    Faiella E; Santucci D; Greco F; Frauenfelder G; Giacobbe V; Muto G; Zobel BB; Grasso RF
    Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):143-152. PubMed ID: 29019021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radiomics Features Measured with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness.
    Hectors SJ; Cherny M; Yadav KK; Beksaç AT; Thulasidass H; Lewis S; Davicioni E; Wang P; Tewari AK; Taouli B
    J Urol; 2019 Sep; 202(3):498-505. PubMed ID: 30958743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naïve patients.
    Washino S; Okochi T; Saito K; Konishi T; Hirai M; Kobayashi Y; Miyagawa T
    BJU Int; 2017 Feb; 119(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 26935594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. PI-RADS v2 and ADC values: is there room for improvement?
    Jordan EJ; Fiske C; Zagoria R; Westphalen AC
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Nov; 43(11):3109-3116. PubMed ID: 29550953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The prediction value of PI-RADS v2 score in high-grade Prostate Cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
    Chen S; Yang Y; Peng T; Yu X; Deng H; Guo Z
    Int J Med Sci; 2020; 17(10):1366-1374. PubMed ID: 32624693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
    Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interreader agreement of PI-RADS v. 2 in assessing prostate cancer with multiparametric MRI: A study using whole-mount histology as the standard of reference.
    Girometti R; Giannarini G; Greco F; Isola M; Cereser L; Como G; Sioletic S; Pizzolitto S; Crestani A; Ficarra V; Zuiani C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Feb; 49(2):546-555. PubMed ID: 30187600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Integration and Diagnostic Accuracy of 3T Nonendorectal coil Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Context of Active Surveillance.
    Curci NE; Lane BR; Shankar PR; Noyes SL; Moriarity AK; Kubat A; Brede C; Montgomery JS; Auffenberg GB; Miller DC; Montie JE; George AK; Davenport MS
    Urology; 2018 Jun; 116():137-143. PubMed ID: 29653121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2) and periprostatic fat thickness on multi-parametric MRI to predict the presence of prostate cancer.
    Cao Y; Cao M; Chen Y; Yu W; Fan Y; Liu Q; Gao G; Zhao Z; Wang X; Jin J
    Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(27):44040-44049. PubMed ID: 28476042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Head-to-head comparison of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v1.
    Polanec S; Helbich TH; Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Georg D; Shariat SF; Aulitzky W; Susani M; Baltzer PA
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27161062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preoperative PI-RADS v2.1 Scoring System Improves Risk Classification in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
    Fukui Y; Yamada Y; Sakamoto S; Horikoshi T; Zhao X; Sato K; Nanba S; Kubota Y; Kanesaka M; Fujimoto A; Shibata H; Goto Y; Sazuka T; Imamura Y; Uno T; Ichikawa T
    Anticancer Res; 2023 Dec; 43(12):5705-5712. PubMed ID: 38030183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.