These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30848460)

  • 1. Building a Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship (QSPR) Model.
    Clark RD; Daga PR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1939():139-159. PubMed ID: 30848460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In-Silico Extraction of Design Ideas Using MMPA-by-QSAR and its Application on ADME Endpoints.
    Koutsoukas A; Chang G; Keefer CE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jan; 59(1):477-485. PubMed ID: 30497262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. General theory for multiple input-output perturbations in complex molecular systems. 1. Linear QSPR electronegativity models in physical, organic, and medicinal chemistry.
    González-Díaz H; Arrasate S; Gómez-SanJuan A; Sotomayor N; Lete E; Besada-Porto L; Ruso JM
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2013; 13(14):1713-41. PubMed ID: 23889050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alvascience: A New Software Suite for the QSAR Workflow Applied to the Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability.
    Mauri A; Bertola M
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Oct; 23(21):. PubMed ID: 36361669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structure Modification toward Applicability Domain of a QSAR/QSPR Model Considering Activity/Property.
    Ochi S; Miyao T; Funatsu K
    Mol Inform; 2017 Dec; 36(12):. PubMed ID: 28815921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regression methods for developing QSAR and QSPR models to predict compounds of specific pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties.
    Yap CW; Li H; Ji ZL; Chen YZ
    Mini Rev Med Chem; 2007 Nov; 7(11):1097-107. PubMed ID: 18045213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AutoWeka: toward an automated data mining software for QSAR and QSPR studies.
    Nantasenamat C; Worachartcheewan A; Jamsak S; Preeyanon L; Shoombuatong W; Simeon S; Mandi P; Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya C; Prachayasittikul V
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1260():119-47. PubMed ID: 25502379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fragmental approach in QSPR.
    Zefirov NS; Palyulin VA
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2002; 42(5):1112-22. PubMed ID: 12376998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing predictive ability of QSAR/QSPR models using 2D and 3D molecular representations.
    Sato A; Miyao T; Jasial S; Funatsu K
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Feb; 35(2):179-193. PubMed ID: 33392949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An integrated computational workflow for efficient and quantitative modeling of renin inhibitors.
    Subramanian G; Rao SN
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2012 Jan; 20(2):851-8. PubMed ID: 22200345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MDCKpred: a web-tool to calculate MDCK permeability coefficient of small molecule using membrane-interaction chemical features.
    Patel RD; Prasanth Kumar S; Pandya HA; Solanki HA
    Toxicol Mech Methods; 2018 Nov; 28(9):685-698. PubMed ID: 29998769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic Evaluation of Local and Global Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of ADME Properties.
    Di Lascio E; Gerebtzoff G; Rodríguez-Pérez R
    Mol Pharm; 2023 Mar; 20(3):1758-1767. PubMed ID: 36745394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated QSPR through Competitive Workflow.
    Cartmell J; Enoch S; Krstajic D; Leahy DE
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2005 Nov; 19(11):821-33. PubMed ID: 16416245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Matrix trace operators: from spectral moments of molecular graphs and complex networks to perturbations in synthetic reactions, micelle nanoparticles, and drug ADME processes.
    Gonzalez-Diaz H; Arrasate S; Juan AG; Sotomayor N; Lete E; Speck-Planche A; Ruso JM; Luan F; Cordeiro MN
    Curr Drug Metab; 2014; 15(4):470-88. PubMed ID: 25204825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SEABED: Small molEcule activity scanner weB servicE baseD.
    Fenollosa C; Otón M; Andrio P; Cortés J; Orozco M; Goñi JR
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 31(5):773-5. PubMed ID: 25348211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving ADMET Prediction Accuracy for Candidate Drugs: Factors to Consider in QSPR Modeling Approaches.
    Chen M; Yang J; Tang C; Lu X; Wei Z; Liu Y; Yu P; Li H
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2024; 24(3):222-242. PubMed ID: 38083894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CORAL: building up the model for bioconcentration factor and defining it's applicability domain.
    Toropov AA; Toropova AP; Lombardo A; Roncaglioni A; Benfenati E; Gini G
    Eur J Med Chem; 2011 Apr; 46(4):1400-3. PubMed ID: 21295893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Legitimate utilization of large descriptor pools for QSPR/QSAR models.
    Katritzky AR; Dobchev DA; Slavov S; Karelson M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2207-13. PubMed ID: 18956833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel distance-based atom-type topological indices DAI for QSPR/QSAR studies of alcohols.
    Lu C; Guo W; Wang Y; Yin C
    J Mol Model; 2006 Sep; 12(6):749-56. PubMed ID: 16411077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AntiMalarial Mode of Action (AMMA) Database: Data Selection, Verification and Chemical Space Analysis.
    Sidorov P; Davioud-Charvet E; Marcou G; Horvath D; Varnek A
    Mol Inform; 2018 Sep; 37(9-10):e1800021. PubMed ID: 29749713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.