These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30848726)

  • 1. The Effect of Online Effort and Reputation of Physicians on Patients' Choice: 3-Wave Data Analysis of China's Good Doctor Website.
    Deng Z; Hong Z; Zhang W; Evans R; Chen Y
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(3):e10170. PubMed ID: 30848726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influencing Factors of Continuous Use of Web-Based Diagnosis and Treatment by Patients With Diabetes: Model Development and Data Analysis.
    Ju C; Zhang S
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Sep; 22(9):e18737. PubMed ID: 32771982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Impact of Signals Transmission on Patients' Choice through E-Consultation Websites: An Econometric Analysis of Secondary Datasets.
    Shah AM; Naqvi RA; Jeong OR
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 34068291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unhappy Patients Are Not Alike: Content Analysis of the Negative Comments from China's Good Doctor Website.
    Zhang W; Deng Z; Hong Z; Evans R; Ma J; Zhang H
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e35. PubMed ID: 29371176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating the Effect of Paid and Free Feedback About Physicians' Telemedicine Services on Patients' and Physicians' Behaviors: Panel Data Analysis.
    Yang H; Zhang X
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(3):e12156. PubMed ID: 30900997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of the Price of Gifts From Patients on Physicians' Service Quality in Online Consultations: Empirical Study Based on Social Exchange Theory.
    Wang Y; Wu H; Xia C; Lu N
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 May; 22(5):e15685. PubMed ID: 32369028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of Interactive Tools in Online Health Care Communities: Social Exchange Theory Perspective.
    Ren D; Ma B
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Mar; 23(3):e21892. PubMed ID: 33709940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jul; 21(7):e13816. PubMed ID: 31350838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of Health Literacy on Effects of Patient Rating Websites: Survey Study Using a Hypothetical Situation and Fictitious Doctors.
    Schulz PJ; Rothenfluh F
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Apr; 22(4):e14134. PubMed ID: 32250275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Influence of Physician Information on Patients' Choice of Physician in mHealth Services Using China's Chunyu Doctor App: Eye-Tracking and Questionnaire Study.
    Shan W; Wang Y; Luan J; Tang P
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Oct; 7(10):e15544. PubMed ID: 31647466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why are so few patients rating their physicians on German physician rating websites? A qualitative study.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Kahrass H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Aug; 18(1):670. PubMed ID: 30157842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Who uses physician-rating websites? Differences in sociodemographic variables, psychographic variables, and health status of users and nonusers of physician-rating websites.
    Terlutter R; Bidmon S; Röttl J
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Mar; 16(3):e97. PubMed ID: 24686918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An analysis of online evaluations on a physician rating website: evidence from a German public reporting instrument.
    Emmert M; Meier F
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e157. PubMed ID: 23919987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developments in the Frequency of Ratings and Evaluation Tendencies: A Review of German Physician Rating Websites.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Reimann S
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e299. PubMed ID: 28842391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What Patients Value in Physicians: Analyzing Drivers of Patient Satisfaction Using Physician-Rating Website Data.
    Bidmon S; Elshiewy O; Terlutter R; Boztug Y
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Feb; 22(2):e13830. PubMed ID: 32012063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rejected Online Feedback From a Swiss Physician Rating Website Between 2008 and 2017: Analysis of 2352 Ratings.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Aug; 22(8):e18374. PubMed ID: 32687479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What explains usage of mobile physician-rating apps? Results from a web-based questionnaire.
    Bidmon S; Terlutter R; Röttl J
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Jun; 16(6):e148. PubMed ID: 24918859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Meyer A; Kahrass H
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Nov; 19(11):e387. PubMed ID: 29122739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors Associated With the Actual Behavior and Intention of Rating Physicians on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study.
    Han X; Li B; Zhang T; Qu J
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e14417. PubMed ID: 32496198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Insights into the impact of online physician reviews on patients' decision making: randomized experiment.
    Grabner-Kräuter S; Waiguny MK
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Apr; 17(4):e93. PubMed ID: 25862516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.