These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3085041)
1. A 12-year audit of IRB decisions. Grodin MA; Zaharoff BE; Kaminow PV QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1986 Mar; 12(3):82-6. PubMed ID: 3085041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research. American Society of Clinical Oncology J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The burgeoning law of medical experimentation involving human subjects. Bryant LE John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1974; 8(1):19-51. PubMed ID: 11663465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Research consent by adolescent minors and institutional review boards. Mammel KA; Kaplan DW J Adolesc Health; 1995 Nov; 17(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 8924437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human experimentation: the review process in practice. Cowan DH Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Human experimentation: issues before the hospital administrator. Wielk CA Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1977; 22(3):4-25. PubMed ID: 12085914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Changing federal regulation of IRBs, Part III: social research and the proposed DHEW regulations. Gray BH IRB; 1980 Jan; 2(1):1-5+. PubMed ID: 11661793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of institutional review boards on cancer research. Kennedy BJ J Bioeth; 1984; 5(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10271128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of the institutional review board in research involving human subjects. Bosso JA Drug Intell Clin Pharm; 1983 Nov; 17(11):828-34. PubMed ID: 6641508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. FDA seeks tighter controls over research with human subjects. Hershey N; Miller RD Hosp Med Staff; 1978 Dec; 7(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 10239337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The institutional review board and beyond: future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation. Edgar H; Rothman DJ Milbank Q; 1995; 73(4):489-506. PubMed ID: 7491097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. IRB review and consent in human tissue research. Merz JF; Leonard DG; Miller ER Science; 1999 Mar; 283(5408):1647-8. PubMed ID: 10189317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Institutional ethics committees. Legitimate and impartial review of ethical health care decisions. Jaffe GA J Leg Med; 1989 Sep; 10(3):393-431. PubMed ID: 2607217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Legal judgments and informed consent in geriatric research. Dubler NN J Am Geriatr Soc; 1987 Jun; 35(6):545-9. PubMed ID: 3571807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Lay participation in medical policy making. II. Human experimentation committees: professional or representative? Veatch RM Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Oct; 5(5):31-40. PubMed ID: 1184371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Research on human subjects: Australian ethics committees take tentative steps. Osborne LW J Med Ethics; 1983 Jun; 9(2):66-8. PubMed ID: 6876099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]