These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30850518)

  • 1. Applying modern coexistence theory to priority effects.
    Grainger TN; Letten AD; Gilbert B; Fukami T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Mar; 116(13):6205-6210. PubMed ID: 30850518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does deterministic coexistence theory matter in a finite world?
    Schreiber SJ; Levine JM; Godoy O; Kraft NJB; Hart SP
    Ecology; 2023 Jan; 104(1):e3838. PubMed ID: 36168209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coexistence and competitive exclusion in mutualism.
    Johnson CA; Bronstein JL
    Ecology; 2019 Jun; 100(6):e02708. PubMed ID: 30924140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A quantitative synthesis of soil microbial effects on plant species coexistence.
    Yan X; Levine JM; Kandlikar GS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 May; 119(22):e2122088119. PubMed ID: 35605114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The three-species problem: Incorporating competitive asymmetry and intransitivity in modern coexistence theory.
    Ranjan R; Koffel T; Klausmeier CA
    Ecol Lett; 2024 Apr; 27(4):e14426. PubMed ID: 38603592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Environmental variability counteracts priority effects to facilitate species coexistence: evidence from nectar microbes.
    Tucker CM; Fukami T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Mar; 281(1778):20132637. PubMed ID: 24430846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Positively and Negatively Autocorrelated Environmental Fluctuations Have Opposing Effects on Species Coexistence.
    Schreiber SJ
    Am Nat; 2021 Apr; 197(4):405-414. PubMed ID: 33755535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial heterogeneity, source-sink dynamics, and the local coexistence of competing species.
    Amarasekare P; Nisbet RM
    Am Nat; 2001 Dec; 158(6):572-84. PubMed ID: 18707352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Species Differences in Phenology Shape Coexistence.
    Blackford C; Germain RM; Gilbert B
    Am Nat; 2020 Jun; 195(6):E168-E180. PubMed ID: 32469665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phylogenetic relatedness predicts priority effects in nectar yeast communities.
    Peay KG; Belisle M; Fukami T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Feb; 279(1729):749-58. PubMed ID: 21775330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Species coexistence: macroevolutionary relationships and the contingency of historical interactions.
    Germain RM; Weir JT; Gilbert B
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Mar; 283(1827):20160047. PubMed ID: 27009226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accounting for demographic uncertainty increases predictions for species coexistence: A case study with annual plants.
    Bowler CH; Weiss-Lehman C; Towers IR; Mayfield MM; Shoemaker LG
    Ecol Lett; 2022 Jul; 25(7):1618-1628. PubMed ID: 35633300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A native annual forb locally excludes a closely related introduced species that co-occurs in oak-savanna habitat remnants.
    Johnson JC; Williams JL
    AoB Plants; 2020 Oct; 12(5):plaa045. PubMed ID: 33033590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coexistence of competitors in marine metacommunities: environmental variability, edge effects, and the dispersal niche.
    Aiken CM; Navarrete SA
    Ecology; 2014 Aug; 95(8):2289-302. PubMed ID: 25230479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrating eco-evolutionary dynamics and modern coexistence theory.
    Yamamichi M; Gibbs T; Levine JM
    Ecol Lett; 2022 Oct; 25(10):2091-2106. PubMed ID: 35962483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Niche and fitness differences relate the maintenance of diversity to ecosystem function.
    Carroll IT; Cardinale BJ; Nisbet RM
    Ecology; 2011 May; 92(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 21661576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of intraspecific phenotypic variation on species coexistence.
    Hausch S; Vamosi SM; Fox JW
    Ecology; 2018 Jun; 99(6):1453-1462. PubMed ID: 29663356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intransitivity is infrequent and fails to promote annual plant coexistence without pairwise niche differences.
    Godoy O; Stouffer DB; Kraft NJB; Levine JM
    Ecology; 2017 May; 98(5):1193-1200. PubMed ID: 28241383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interactions between fitness components across the life cycle constrain competitor coexistence.
    Gómez-Llano M; Boys WA; Ping T; Tye SP; Siepielski AM
    J Anim Ecol; 2023 Dec; 92(12):2297-2308. PubMed ID: 37087690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structured environments foster competitor coexistence by manipulating interspecies interfaces.
    Ursell T
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jan; 17(1):e1007762. PubMed ID: 33412560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.