729 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30850590)
1. CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing induces megabase-scale chromosomal truncations.
Cullot G; Boutin J; Toutain J; Prat F; Pennamen P; Rooryck C; Teichmann M; Rousseau E; Lamrissi-Garcia I; Guyonnet-Duperat V; Bibeyran A; Lalanne M; Prouzet-Mauléon V; Turcq B; Ged C; Blouin JM; Richard E; Dabernat S; Moreau-Gaudry F; Bedel A
Nat Commun; 2019 Mar; 10(1):1136. PubMed ID: 30850590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Covalent linkage of the DNA repair template to the CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease enhances homology-directed repair.
Savic N; Ringnalda FC; Lindsay H; Berk C; Bargsten K; Li Y; Neri D; Robinson MD; Ciaudo C; Hall J; Jinek M; Schwank G
Elife; 2018 May; 7():. PubMed ID: 29809142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precision genome editing in the CRISPR era.
Salsman J; Dellaire G
Biochem Cell Biol; 2017 Apr; 95(2):187-201. PubMed ID: 28177771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Precise and Predictable CRISPR Chromosomal Rearrangements Reveal Principles of Cas9-Mediated Nucleotide Insertion.
Shou J; Li J; Liu Y; Wu Q
Mol Cell; 2018 Aug; 71(4):498-509.e4. PubMed ID: 30033371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of genome editing through CRISPR-Cas9 engineering.
Zhang JH; Adikaram P; Pandey M; Genis A; Simonds WF
Bioengineered; 2016 Apr; 7(3):166-74. PubMed ID: 27340770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of the interplay between DNA repair and CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA lesions at an endogenous locus.
Bothmer A; Phadke T; Barrera LA; Margulies CM; Lee CS; Buquicchio F; Moss S; Abdulkerim HS; Selleck W; Jayaram H; Myer VE; Cotta-Ramusino C
Nat Commun; 2017 Jan; 8():13905. PubMed ID: 28067217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Versatile and precise gene-targeting strategies for functional studies in mammalian cell lines.
Wassef M; Luscan A; Battistella A; Le Corre S; Li H; Wallace MR; Vidaud M; Margueron R
Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():45-54. PubMed ID: 28499832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Target binding and residence: a new determinant of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice in CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.
Feng Y; Liu S; Chen R; Xie A
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2021 Jan; 22(1):73-86. PubMed ID: 33448189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methods Favoring Homology-Directed Repair Choice in Response to CRISPR/Cas9 Induced-Double Strand Breaks.
Yang H; Ren S; Yu S; Pan H; Li T; Ge S; Zhang J; Xia N
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Sep; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 32899704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CRISPR-Cas9 fusion to dominant-negative 53BP1 enhances HDR and inhibits NHEJ specifically at Cas9 target sites.
Jayavaradhan R; Pillis DM; Goodman M; Zhang F; Zhang Y; Andreassen PR; Malik P
Nat Commun; 2019 Jun; 10(1):2866. PubMed ID: 31253785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CRISPR Nickase-Mediated Base Editing in Yeast.
Kuroda K; Ueda M
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2196():27-37. PubMed ID: 32889710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simplified CRISPR tools for efficient genome editing and streamlined protocols for their delivery into mammalian cells and mouse zygotes.
Jacobi AM; Rettig GR; Turk R; Collingwood MA; Zeiner SA; Quadros RM; Harms DW; Bonthuis PJ; Gregg C; Ohtsuka M; Gurumurthy CB; Behlke MA
Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():16-28. PubMed ID: 28351759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CRISPR-Cas9 in genome editing: Its function and medical applications.
Khadempar S; Familghadakchi S; Motlagh RA; Farahani N; Dashtiahangar M; Rezaei H; Gheibi Hayat SM
J Cell Physiol; 2019 May; 234(5):5751-5761. PubMed ID: 30362544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery.
Lin S; Staahl BT; Alla RK; Doudna JA
Elife; 2014 Dec; 3():e04766. PubMed ID: 25497837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of single guided Cas9 nickase to facilitate precise and efficient genome editing in human iPSCs.
Li PP; Margolis RL
Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):9865. PubMed ID: 33972655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Target-Specific Precision of CRISPR-Mediated Genome Editing.
Chakrabarti AM; Henser-Brownhill T; Monserrat J; Poetsch AR; Luscombe NM; Scaffidi P
Mol Cell; 2019 Feb; 73(4):699-713.e6. PubMed ID: 30554945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rational Selection of CRISPR-Cas9 Guide RNAs for Homology-Directed Genome Editing.
Tatiossian KJ; Clark RDE; Huang C; Thornton ME; Grubbs BH; Cannon PM
Mol Ther; 2021 Mar; 29(3):1057-1069. PubMed ID: 33160457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9-based knock-in approaches in zebrafish.
Albadri S; Del Bene F; Revenu C
Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():77-85. PubMed ID: 28300641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CRISPR-Cas9 system-driven site-specific selection pressure on Herpes simplex virus genomes.
Li Z; Bi Y; Xiao H; Sun L; Ren Y; Li Y; Chen C; Cun W
Virus Res; 2018 Jan; 244():286-295. PubMed ID: 28279800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optical Control of Genome Editing by Photoactivatable Cas9.
Otabe T; Nihongaki Y; Sato M
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2312():225-233. PubMed ID: 34228293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
