129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30853095)
1. Hospital and surgeon variation in positive circumferential resection margin among rectal cancer patients.
Justiniano CF; Aquina CT; Fleming FJ; Xu Z; Boscoe FP; Schymura MJ; Temple LK; Becerra AZ
Am J Surg; 2019 Nov; 218(5):881-886. PubMed ID: 30853095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Circumferential Resection Margin as a Hospital Quality Assessment Tool for Rectal Cancer Surgery.
Patel SH; Hu CY; Massarweh NN; You YN; McCabe R; Dietz D; Facktor MA; Chang GJ
J Am Coll Surg; 2020 Jun; 230(6):1008-1018.e5. PubMed ID: 32142927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgeon-Level Variation in Utilization of Local Staging and Neoadjuvant Therapy for Stage II-III Rectal Adenocarcinoma.
Swords DS; Skarda DE; Sause WT; Gawlick U; Cannon GM; Lewis MA; Scaife CL; Gygi JA; Tae Kim H
J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Apr; 23(4):659-669. PubMed ID: 30706375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can pathological reports of rectal cancer provide national quality indicators?
Keane C; Lin AY; Kramer N; Bissett I
ANZ J Surg; 2018 Sep; 88(9):E639-E643. PubMed ID: 29569820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery.
Birbeck KF; Macklin CP; Tiffin NJ; Parsons W; Dixon MF; Mapstone NP; Abbott CR; Scott N; Finan PJ; Johnston D; Quirke P
Ann Surg; 2002 Apr; 235(4):449-57. PubMed ID: 11923599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oncological Outcomes After Robotic Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: Analysis of a Prospective Database.
Sammour T; Malakorn S; Bednarski BK; Kaur H; Shin US; Messick C; You YN; Chang GJ
Ann Surg; 2018 Mar; 267(3):521-526. PubMed ID: 27997470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of the positive pathologic circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: A national cancer database (NCDB) study.
Reif de Paula T; Augestad KM; Kiran RP; Keller DS
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):296-303. PubMed ID: 32800594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer.
Porter GA; Soskolne CL; Yakimets WW; Newman SC
Ann Surg; 1998 Feb; 227(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 9488510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patterns of failure in rectal cancer with positive circumferential resection margin after surgery following preoperative chemoradiation: a propensity score matching analysis.
Kim Y; Kim DY; Kim TH; Kim SY; Baek JY; Kim MJ; Chang HJ; Cha Y; Park SC; Oh JH
Br J Radiol; 2018 Dec; 91(1092):20180143. PubMed ID: 30129789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term Oncologic Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Followed by Intersphincteric Resection With Coloanal Anastomosis for Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer.
Park JS; Park SY; Kim HJ; Cho SH; Kwak SG; Choi GS
Dis Colon Rectum; 2019 Apr; 62(4):408-416. PubMed ID: 30688680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population-based retrospective study.
Liu Q; Luo D; Cai S; Li Q; Li X
Cancer Med; 2018 Aug; 7(8):3673-3681. PubMed ID: 29992773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. International evaluation of circumferential resection margins after rectal cancer resection: insights from the Swedish and Dutch audits.
Detering R; Saraste D; de Neree Tot Babberich MPM; Dekker JWT; Wouters MWJM; van Geloven AAW; Bemelman WA; Tanis PJ; Martling A; Westerterp M;
Colorectal Dis; 2020 Apr; 22(4):416-429. PubMed ID: 31696599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nationwide Heterogeneity in Hospital-Specific Probabilities of Rectal Cancer Understaging and Its Effects on Outcomes.
Becerra AZ; Wexner SD; Dietz DW; Xu Z; Aquina CT; Justiniano CF; Swanger AA; Temple LK; Noyes K; Monson JR; Fleming FJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):2332-2339. PubMed ID: 29850952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Distal Resection Margin of ≤1 mm and Rectal Cancer Recurrence After Sphincter-Preserving Surgery: The Role of a Positive Distal Margin in Rectal Cancer Surgery.
Zeng WG; Liu MJ; Zhou ZX; Wang ZJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Nov; 60(11):1175-1183. PubMed ID: 28991082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Circumferential margin involvement after total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer: are all R1 resections equal?
Beaufrère A; Guedj N; Maggiori L; Patroni A; Bedossa P; Panis Y
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Nov; 19(11):O377-O385. PubMed ID: 28941054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Influence of Hospital Volume on Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement: Results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit.
Gietelink L; Henneman D; van Leersum NJ; de Noo M; Manusama E; Tanis PJ; Tollenaar RA; Wouters MW;
Ann Surg; 2016 Apr; 263(4):745-50. PubMed ID: 25790120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Jeyarajah S; Sutton CD; Miller AS; Hemingway D;
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):808-15. PubMed ID: 17441969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk Factors Associated With Circumferential Resection Margin Positivity in Rectal Cancer: A Binational Registry Study.
Warrier SK; Kong JC; Guerra GR; Chittleborough TJ; Naik A; Ramsay RG; Lynch AC; Heriot AG
Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Apr; 61(4):433-440. PubMed ID: 29521824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does circumferential tumor location affect the circumferential resection margin status in mid and low rectal cancer?
Kang BM; Park YK; Park SJ; Lee KY; Kim CW; Lee SH
Asian J Surg; 2018 May; 41(3):257-263. PubMed ID: 28118954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High Rate of Positive Circumferential Resection Margins Following Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Call to Action.
Rickles AS; Dietz DW; Chang GJ; Wexner SD; Berho ME; Remzi FH; Greene FL; Fleshman JW; Abbas MA; Peters W; Noyes K; Monson JR; Fleming FJ;
Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):891-8. PubMed ID: 26473651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
