129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30853095)
21. Routine splenic flexure mobilization may increase compliance with pathological quality metrics in patients undergoing low anterior resection.
Mouw TJ; King C; Ashcraft JH; Valentino JD; DiPasco PJ; Al-Kasspooles M
Colorectal Dis; 2019 Jan; 21(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 30184316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A novel risk-adjusted nomogram for rectal cancer surgery outcomes.
Russell MC; You YN; Hu CY; Cormier JN; Feig BW; Skibber JM; Rodriguez-Bigas MA; Nelson H; Chang GJ
JAMA Surg; 2013 Aug; 148(8):769-77. PubMed ID: 23803722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of hospital volume on resection margins in rectal cancer surgery.
Atkinson SJ; Daly MC; Midura EF; Etzioni DA; Abbott DE; Shah SA; Davis BR; Paquette IM
J Surg Res; 2016 Jul; 204(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 27451863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Completely Abdominal Approach Laparoscopic Partial Intersphincteric Resection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Initial cT3 Juxta-Anal Rectal Cancer.
Huang S; Huang Y; Chi P; Lin H; Lu X; Xu Z; Sun Y; Wang X
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Jun; 29(6):809-816. PubMed ID: 30596539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. High volume improves outcomes: The argument for centralization of rectal cancer surgery.
Aquina CT; Probst CP; Becerra AZ; Iannuzzi JC; Kelly KN; Hensley BJ; Rickles AS; Noyes K; Fleming FJ; Monson JR
Surgery; 2016 Mar; 159(3):736-48. PubMed ID: 26576696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinicopathological factors associated with positive circumferential margins in rectal cancers.
Pasch JA; MacDermid E; Pasch LB; Premaratne C; Fok KY; Kotecha K; El Khoury T; Barto W
ANZ J Surg; 2019 Dec; 89(12):1636-1641. PubMed ID: 31496039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Multicentre study of circumferential margin positivity and outcomes following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
Kennelly RP; Rogers AC; Winter DC;
Br J Surg; 2013 Jan; 100(1):160-6. PubMed ID: 23147085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Continuous Effect of Radial Resection Margin on Recurrence and Survival in Rectal Cancer Patients Who Receive Preoperative Chemoradiation and Curative Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.
Sung S; Kim SH; Lee JH; Nam TK; Jeong S; Jang HS; Song JH; Lee JW; Bae JM; Lee JH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jul; 98(3):647-653. PubMed ID: 28581407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Factors associated with noncomplete mesorectal excision following surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma.
Sapci I; Velazco JS; Xhaja X; Aiello A; Gorgun E; Stocchi L; Delaney CP; Steele SR; Valente MA
Am J Surg; 2019 Mar; 217(3):465-468. PubMed ID: 30454839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial.
den Dulk M; Marijnen CA; Putter H; Rutten HJ; Beets GL; Wiggers T; Nagtegaal ID; van de Velde CJ
Ann Surg; 2007 Jul; 246(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 17592295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with the single-docking technique for patients with rectal cancer.
Huang CW; Tsai HL; Yeh YS; Su WC; Huang MY; Huang CM; Chang YT; Wang JY
BMC Surg; 2017 Dec; 17(1):126. PubMed ID: 29208050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Patient survival after surgical treatment of rectal cancer: impact of surgeon and hospital characteristics.
Etzioni DA; Young-Fadok TM; Cima RR; Wasif N; Madoff RD; Naessens JM; Habermann EB
Cancer; 2014 Aug; 120(16):2472-81. PubMed ID: 24802276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Importance of a Minimal Tumor-Free Resection Margin in Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer.
Alberda WJ; Verhoef C; Schipper ME; Nuyttens JJ; Rothbarth J; de Wilt JH; Burger JW
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jul; 58(7):677-85. PubMed ID: 26200682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Risk-adjusted pathologic margin positivity rate as a quality indicator in rectal cancer surgery.
Massarweh NN; Hu CY; You YN; Bednarski BK; Rodriguez-Bigas MA; Skibber JM; Cantor SB; Cormier JN; Feig BW; Chang GJ
J Clin Oncol; 2014 Sep; 32(27):2967-74. PubMed ID: 25092785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The clinical significance of a pathologically positive lymph node at the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer.
Patel A; Green N; Sarmah P; Langman G; Chandrakumaran K; Youssef H
Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Feb; 23(2):151-159. PubMed ID: 30783863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The influence of hospital volume on long-term oncological outcome after rectal cancer surgery.
Jonker FHW; Hagemans JAW; Burger JWA; Verhoef C; Borstlap WAA; Tanis PJ;
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Dec; 32(12):1741-1747. PubMed ID: 28884251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quality Improvement for Surgical Resection of Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma : Hospital and Surgeon Predictors of Higher Than Expected R1 Resection Using the National Cancer Database.
Nuckles BW; Lam K; Young KA; Dove JT; Shabahang MM; Blansfield JA
Am Surg; 2021 Mar; 87(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 32993353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The role of the laparoscopy on circumferential resection margin positivity in patients with rectal cancer: long-term outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
Dural AC; Keskin M; Balik E; Akici M; Kunduz E; Yamaner S; Asoglu O; Gulluoglu M; Bugra D
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2015 Apr; 25(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 25159046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Outcomes of a Single Surgeon-Based Transanal-Total Mesorectal Excision (TATME) for Rectal Cancer.
Caycedo-Marulanda A; Jiang HY; Kohtakangas EL
J Gastrointest Cancer; 2018 Dec; 49(4):455-462. PubMed ID: 28702861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
