These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30853110)
1. Thought as a determinant of political opinion. Sloman SA; Rabb N Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():1-7. PubMed ID: 30853110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of conspiracy beliefs on conventional and unconventional forms of political participation: The mediating role of political efficacy. Ardèvol-Abreu A; Gil de Zúñiga H; Gámez E Br J Soc Psychol; 2020 Apr; 59(2):549-569. PubMed ID: 32080870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Science beliefs, political ideology, and cognitive sophistication. Pennycook G; Bago B; McPhetres J J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jan; 152(1):80-97. PubMed ID: 35925740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Public political thought: bridging the sociological-philosophical divide in the study of legitimacy. Abulof U Br J Sociol; 2016 Jun; 67(2):371-91. PubMed ID: 27230593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neither ideologues nor agnostics: alternative voters' belief system in an age of partisan politics. Baldassarri D; Goldberg A AJS; 2014 Jul; 120(1):45-95. PubMed ID: 25705780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bringing political psychology into the study of populism. Rovira Kaltwasser C Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Apr; 376(1822):20200148. PubMed ID: 33611993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cognitive and emotional correlates of belief in political misinformation: Who endorses partisan misbeliefs? Sanchez C; Dunning D Emotion; 2021 Aug; 21(5):1091-1102. PubMed ID: 33734738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America. Druckman JN; Klar S; Krupnikov Y; Levendusky M; Ryan JB Nat Hum Behav; 2021 Jan; 5(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 33230283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide. Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Open-Minded Cognition. Price E; Ottati V; Wilson C; Kim S Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1488-504. PubMed ID: 26315581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The New Right and family politics. Somerville J Econ Soc; 1992 May; 21(2):93-128. PubMed ID: 12317778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of personality on cognitive, behavioral, and affective political processes: the effects of need to evaluate. Bizer GY; Krosnick JA; Holbrook AL; Wheeler SC; Rucker DD; Petty RE J Pers; 2004 Oct; 72(5):995-1027. PubMed ID: 15335335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A moral house divided: How idealized family models impact political cognition. Feinberg M; Wehling E PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0193347. PubMed ID: 29641618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Belief in the Utility of Cross-Partisan Empathy Reduces Partisan Animosity and Facilitates Political Persuasion. Santos LA; Voelkel JG; Willer R; Zaki J Psychol Sci; 2022 Sep; 33(9):1557-1573. PubMed ID: 36041234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Science and deliberation]. Ravazzi S Epidemiol Prev; 2008; 32(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 19353967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Facebook's Spiral of Silence and Participation: The Role of Political Expression on Facebook and Partisan Strength in Political Participation. Kim M Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2016 Dec; 19(12):696-702. PubMed ID: 27849357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feeling superior is a bipartisan issue: extremity (not direction) of political views predicts perceived belief superiority. Toner K; Leary MR; Asher MW; Jongman-Sereno KP Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2454-62. PubMed ID: 24096379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]