198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30853548)
1. Machine learning polymer models of three-dimensional chromatin organization in human lymphoblastoid cells.
Al Bkhetan Z; Kadlof M; Kraft A; Plewczynski D
Methods; 2019 Aug; 166():83-90. PubMed ID: 30853548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional Epigenome Statistical Model: Genome-wide Chromatin Looping Prediction.
Al Bkhetan Z; Plewczynski D
Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):5217. PubMed ID: 29581440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Constructing 3D interaction maps from 1D epigenomes.
Zhu Y; Chen Z; Zhang K; Wang M; Medovoy D; Whitaker JW; Ding B; Li N; Zheng L; Wang W
Nat Commun; 2016 Mar; 7():10812. PubMed ID: 26960733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparative Study of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for the Prediction of Long-Range Chromatin Interactions.
Vanhaeren T; Divina F; García-Torres M; Gómez-Vela F; Vanhoof W; Martínez-García PM
Genes (Basel); 2020 Aug; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 32847102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic sequence-based prediction of long-range chromatin interactions suggests a potential role of short tandem repeat sequences in genome organization.
Nikumbh S; Pfeifer N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):218. PubMed ID: 28420341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. From DNA human sequence to the chromatin higher order organisation and its biological meaning: Using biomolecular interaction networks to understand the influence of structural variation on spatial genome organisation and its functional effect.
Chiliński M; Sengupta K; Plewczynski D
Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2022 Jan; 121():171-185. PubMed ID: 34429265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An integrated 3-Dimensional Genome Modeling Engine for data-driven simulation of spatial genome organization.
Szałaj P; Tang Z; Michalski P; Pietal MJ; Luo OJ; Sadowski M; Li X; Radew K; Ruan Y; Plewczynski D
Genome Res; 2016 Dec; 26(12):1697-1709. PubMed ID: 27789526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In silico prediction of high-resolution Hi-C interaction matrices.
Zhang S; Chasman D; Knaack S; Roy S
Nat Commun; 2019 Dec; 10(1):5449. PubMed ID: 31811132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting chromatin architecture from models of polymer physics.
Bianco S; Chiariello AM; Annunziatella C; Esposito A; Nicodemi M
Chromosome Res; 2017 Mar; 25(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 28070687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting CTCF-mediated chromatin interactions by integrating genomic and epigenomic features.
Kai Y; Andricovich J; Zeng Z; Zhu J; Tzatsos A; Peng W
Nat Commun; 2018 Oct; 9(1):4221. PubMed ID: 30310060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DeepChIA-PET: Accurately predicting ChIA-PET from Hi-C and ChIP-seq with deep dilated networks.
Liu T; Wang Z
PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Jul; 19(7):e1011307. PubMed ID: 37440599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding 3D Genome Organization and Its Effect on Transcriptional Gene Regulation Under Environmental Stress in Plant: A Chromatin Perspective.
Kumar S; Kaur S; Seem K; Kumar S; Mohapatra T
Front Cell Dev Biol; 2021; 9():774719. PubMed ID: 34957106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Epigenomics in 3D: importance of long-range spreading and specific interactions in epigenomic maintenance.
Jost D; Vaillant C
Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Mar; 46(5):2252-2264. PubMed ID: 29365171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chromatin interaction networks revealed unique connectivity patterns of broad H3K4me3 domains and super enhancers in 3D chromatin.
Thibodeau A; Márquez EJ; Shin DG; Vera-Licona P; Ucar D
Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):14466. PubMed ID: 29089515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Machine learning approaches infer vitamin D signaling: Critical impact of vitamin D receptor binding within topologically associated domains.
Carlberg C; Neme A
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol; 2019 Jan; 185():103-109. PubMed ID: 30044963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Machine and deep learning methods for predicting 3D genome organization.
Wall BPG; Nguyen M; Harrell JC; Dozmorov MG
ArXiv; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38495565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computational modeling of chromatin accessibility identified important epigenomic regulators.
Zhao Y; Dong Y; Hong W; Jiang C; Yao K; Cheng C
BMC Genomics; 2022 Jan; 23(1):19. PubMed ID: 34996354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chromatin loop anchors predict transcript and exon usage.
Zhang Y; Cai Y; Roca X; Kwoh CK; Fullwood MJ
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34263910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Local Epigenomic Data are more Informative than Local Genome Sequence Data in Predicting Enhancer-Promoter Interactions Using Neural Networks.
Xiao M; Zhuang Z; Pan W
Genes (Basel); 2019 Dec; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 31905774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distinct genomic and epigenomic features demarcate hypomethylated blocks in colon cancer.
Sharmin M; Bravo HC; Hannenhalli S
BMC Cancer; 2016 Feb; 16():88. PubMed ID: 26868017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
