These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30854445)

  • 1. Phantom Validation of DCE-MRI Magnitude and Phase-Based Vascular Input Function Measurements.
    Foltz W; Driscoll B; Laurence Lee S; Nayak K; Nallapareddy N; Fatemi A; Ménard C; Coolens C; Chung C
    Tomography; 2019 Mar; 5(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 30854445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
    Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a dynamic flow imaging phantom for dynamic contrast-enhanced CT.
    Driscoll B; Keller H; Coolens C
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4866-80. PubMed ID: 21928658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved repeatability of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using the complex MRI signal to derive arterial input functions: a test-retest study in prostate cancer patients.
    Klawer EME; van Houdt PJ; Simonis FFJ; van den Berg CAT; Pos FJ; Heijmink SWTPJ; Isebaert S; Haustermans K; van der Heide UA
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 May; 81(5):3358-3369. PubMed ID: 30656738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo quantification of contrast agent concentration using the induced magnetic field for time-resolved arterial input function measurement with MRI.
    de Rochefort L; Nguyen T; Brown R; Spincemaille P; Choi G; Weinsaft J; Prince MR; Wang Y
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5328-39. PubMed ID: 19175092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Absolute quantification of regional renal blood flow in swine by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a blood pool contrast agent.
    Lüdemann L; Nafz B; Elsner F; Grosse-Siestrup C; Meissler M; Kaufels N; Rehbein H; Persson PB; Michaely HJ; Lengsfeld P; Voth M; Gutberlet M
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Mar; 44(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 19151609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating the arterial input function from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data with compensation for flow enhancement (I): Theory, method, and phantom experiments.
    van Schie JJN; Lavini C; van Vliet LJ; Vos FM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1190-1196. PubMed ID: 29193415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving the arterial input function in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI by fitting the signal in the complex plane.
    Simonis FF; Sbrizzi A; Beld E; Lagendijk JJ; van den Berg CA
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Oct; 76(4):1236-45. PubMed ID: 26525012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subcompartmentalization of extracellular extravascular space (EES) into permeability and leaky space with local arterial input function (AIF) results in improved discrimination between high- and low-grade glioma using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.
    Sahoo P; Rathore RK; Awasthi R; Roy B; Verma S; Rathore D; Behari S; Husain M; Husain N; Pandey CM; Mohakud S; Gupta RK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):677-88. PubMed ID: 23390002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phase-based arterial input function measurements in the femoral arteries for quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and comparison with DCE-CT.
    Korporaal JG; van den Berg CA; van Osch MJ; Groenendaal G; van Vulpen M; van der Heide UA
    Magn Reson Med; 2011 Nov; 66(5):1267-74. PubMed ID: 21604291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of CAIPIRINHA-VIBE, Radial-VIBE, and conventional VIBE sequences for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI: A validation study using a DCE-MRI phantom.
    Kim B; Lee CK; Seo N; Lee SS; Kim JK; Choi Y; Woo DC; Kim IS; Nickel D; Kim KW
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 34(5):638-44. PubMed ID: 26747409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy, repeatability, and interplatform reproducibility of T
    Bane O; Hectors SJ; Wagner M; Arlinghaus LL; Aryal MP; Cao Y; Chenevert TL; Fennessy F; Huang W; Hylton NM; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Keenan KE; Malyarenko DI; Mulkern RV; Newitt DC; Russek SE; Stupic KF; Tudorica A; Wilmes LJ; Yankeelov TE; Yen YF; Boss MA; Taouli B
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 May; 79(5):2564-2575. PubMed ID: 28913930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimization of the reference region method for dual pharmacokinetic modeling using Gd-DTPA/MRI and (18) F-FDG/PET.
    Poulin É; Lebel R; Croteau É; Blanchette M; Tremblay L; Lecomte R; Bentourkia M; Lepage M
    Magn Reson Med; 2015 Feb; 73(2):740-8. PubMed ID: 24604379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arterial input function calculation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: an in vivo validation study using co-registered contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.
    Mehrabian H; Chandrana C; Pang I; Chopra R; Martel AL
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Aug; 22(8):1735-47. PubMed ID: 22752523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal resolution improvement of calibration-free dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with compressed sensing optimized turbo spin echo: The effects of replacing turbo factor with compressed sensing accelerations.
    Han S; Cho H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 44(1):138-47. PubMed ID: 26713414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Quantitative Lung Perfusion Imaging Using the Dual-Bolus Approach: Comparison of 3 Contrast Agents and Recommendation of Feasible Doses.
    Veldhoen S; Oechsner M; Fischer A; Weng AM; Kunz AS; Bley TA; Köstler H; Ritter CO
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 26606550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of neuroendocrine liver metastases: a comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
    Armbruster M; Sourbron S; Haug A; Zech CJ; Ingrisch M; Auernhammer CJ; Nikolaou K; Paprottka PM; Rist C; Reiser MF; Sommer WH
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 24002080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraindividual quantitative and qualitative comparison of gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadobutrol in time-resolved contrast-enhanced 4-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in minipigs.
    Hadizadeh DR; Jost G; Pietsch H; Weibrecht M; Perkuhn M; Boschewitz JM; Keil VC; Träber F; Kukuk GM; Schild HH; Willinek WA
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):457-64. PubMed ID: 24598442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility of the gadolinium concentration measurements and of the fitting parameters of the vascular input function in the superior sagittal sinus in a patient population.
    Lavini C; Verhoeff JJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Dec; 28(10):1420-30. PubMed ID: 20817379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the effect of haematocrit-dependent arterial input functions on the accuracy of pharmacokinetic parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Just N; Koh DM; D'Arcy J; Collins DJ; Leach MO
    NMR Biomed; 2011 Aug; 24(7):902-15. PubMed ID: 21290457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.