355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30854816)
1. [Effect of materials and superstructure designs on the passive fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses].
Song S; Zheng Z; Yang LY; Gao X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 37(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 30854816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microfractures in metal-ceramic and all-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses caused by superstructure fixation.
Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Beck N
Dent Mater J; 2012; 31(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 22673463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants.
Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley W; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Influence of coping material selection and porcelain firing on marginal and internal fit of computer-aided design/computer- aided manufacturing of zirconia and titanium ceramic implant-supported crowns].
Cuiling L; Liyuan Y; Xu G; Hong S
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 34(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 27526450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro precision of fit of computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured titanium screw-retained fixed dental prostheses before and after ceramic veneering.
Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R; Enkling N; Katsoulis K; Blatz MB
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 24289301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 29475755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of fit of CNC-milled titanium and zirconia frameworks to implants.
Abduo J; Lyons K; Waddell N; Bennani V; Swain M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e20-9. PubMed ID: 21414138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with CAD/CAM-fabricated porcelain crown and zirconia-based framework.
Takaba M; Tanaka S; Ishiura Y; Baba K
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 23289495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal fit of implant-supported all-ceramic zirconia frameworks.
Zaghloul HH; Younis JF
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Aug; 39(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 23964776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fit of 3Y-TZP complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses before and after porcelain veneering.
Svanborg P; Norström Saarva V; Stenport V; Eliasson A
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):137-141. PubMed ID: 30885581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of material selection on the passivity of fit of implant-supported restorations created with computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture.
Karl M; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):739-45. PubMed ID: 21841982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture load of tooth-implant-retained zirconia ceramic fixed dental prostheses: effect of span length and preparation design.
Gabbert O; Karatzogiannis E; Ohlmann B; Schmitter M; Karl J; Rammelsberg P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):719-725. PubMed ID: 21812819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrievable metal ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with milled titanium frameworks and all-ceramic crowns: retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up.
Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Borges J; Almeida R
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 22339902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of peri-implant submucosal microbiota in arches with zirconia or titanium implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Jia P; Yang J; Yue Z; Liu J; Liu Q; Liu Z; Tang L; Hou J
Trials; 2020 Nov; 21(1):979. PubMed ID: 33246481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tooth-implant-supported posterior fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks: 3-year clinical result.
Beuer F; Sachs C; Groesser J; Gueth JF; Stimmelmayr M
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):1079-86. PubMed ID: 26399980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Influence of different designs and porcelain/glaze firing on the marginal and internal fit of implant-supported zirconia crowns].
Cuiling L; Xu G; Yuping Q; Liyuan Y
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 34(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 27266201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of press-on-metal and conventional ceramic systems for three- and four-unit implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro study.
Bayramoğlu E; Özkan YK; Yildiz C
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 25858218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
