189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30855010)
21. Association Between Lead Time and Prostate Cancer Grade: Evidence of Grade Progression from Long-term Follow-up of Large Population-based Cohorts Not Subject to Prostate-specific Antigen Screening.
Assel M; Dahlin A; Ulmert D; Bergh A; Stattin P; Lilja H; Vickers AJ
Eur Urol; 2018 Jun; 73(6):961-967. PubMed ID: 29066048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
Moyer VA;
Ann Intern Med; 2012 Jul; 157(2):120-34. PubMed ID: 22801674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Screening Trials and Revised PSA Screening Guidelines on Rates of Prostate Biopsy and Postbiopsy Complications.
Gershman B; Van Houten HK; Herrin J; Moreira DM; Kim SP; Shah ND; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2017 Jan; 71(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 26995328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prostate cancer survivors' beliefs about screening and treatment decision-making experiences in an era of controversy.
Orom H; Underwood W; Homish DL; Kiviniemi MT; Homish GG; Nelson CJ; Schiffman Z
Psychooncology; 2015 Sep; 24(9):1073-9. PubMed ID: 25382436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Detection of prostate cancer: the impact of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).
Schröder FH
Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():2-6; discussion 92-3. PubMed ID: 15780157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [PSA screening and molecular markers].
Lakes J; Arsov C
Urologe A; 2019 May; 58(5):486-493. PubMed ID: 30874831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. National Prostate Cancer Screening Rates After the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Discouraging Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening.
Drazer MW; Huo D; Eggener SE
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Aug; 33(22):2416-23. PubMed ID: 26056181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Results of the spanish section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Update after 21 years of follow-up.
Luján Galán M; Páez Borda Á; Llanes González L; Romero Cajigal I; Berenguer Sánchez A
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2020; 44(6):430-436. PubMed ID: 32147352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimizing prostate cancer screening; prospective randomized controlled study of the role of PSA and PCA3 testing in a sequential manner in an opportunistic screening program.
Rubio-Briones J; Casanova J; Dumont R; Rubio L; Fernandez-Serra A; Casanova-Salas I; Domínguez-Escrig J; Ramírez-Backhaus M; Collado A; Gómez-Ferrer A; Iborra I; Monrós JL; Ricós JV; Solsona E; Salas D; Martínez F; Lopez-Guerrero JA
Actas Urol Esp; 2014 May; 38(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 24169211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Primary care physician PSA screening practices before and after the final U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.
Cohn JA; Wang CE; Lakeman JC; Silverstein JC; Brendler CB; Novakovic KR; McGuire MS; Helfand BT
Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):41.e23-30. PubMed ID: 23911680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Histological inflammation and risk of subsequent prostate cancer among men with initially elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial.
Yli-Hemminki TH; Laurila M; Auvinen A; Määttänen L; Huhtala H; Tammela TL; Kujala PM
BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 23746332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Use of low free to total PSA ratio in prostate cancer screening: detection rates, clinical and pathological findings in Brazilian men with serum PSA levels <4.0 ng/mL.
Faria EF; Carvalhal GF; dos Reis RB; Tobias-Machado M; Vieira RA; Reis LO; Nogueira L; Machado RD; Freitas CH; Magnabosco WJ; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E653-7. PubMed ID: 22892057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Testing and referral patterns in the years surrounding the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation against prostate-specific antigen screening.
Hutchinson R; Akhtar A; Haridas J; Bhat D; Roehrborn C; Lotan Y
Cancer; 2016 Dec; 122(24):3785-3793. PubMed ID: 27658175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is further screening of men with baseline PSA < 1 ng ml(-1) worthwhile? The discussion continues-Results of the Swiss ERSPC (Aarau).
Randazzo M; Beatrice J; Huber A; Grobholz R; Manka L; Chun FK; Kluth LA; Wyler SF; Recker F; Kwiatkowski M
Int J Cancer; 2015 Aug; 137(3):553-9. PubMed ID: 25565393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Trends in incidence and 5-year mortality in men with newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer-A population-based analysis of 2 national cohorts.
Helgstrand JT; Røder MA; Klemann N; Toft BG; Lichtensztajn DY; Brooks JD; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
Cancer; 2018 Jul; 124(14):2931-2938. PubMed ID: 29723398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Long-term prostate-specific antigen contamination in the Spanish arm of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).
Luján M; Páez Á; Angulo JC; Granados R; Nevado M; Torres GM; Berenguer A
Actas Urol Esp; 2016 Apr; 40(3):164-72. PubMed ID: 26620123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The impact of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPTSTF) recommendations against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing on PSA testing in Australia.
Zargar H; van den Bergh R; Moon D; Lawrentschuk N; Costello A; Murphy D
BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):110-115. PubMed ID: 27454454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of the USPSTF PSA screening recommendation on prostate cancer incidence patterns in the USA.
Fleshner K; Carlsson SV; Roobol MJ
Nat Rev Urol; 2017 Jan; 14(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 27995937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test: a review of current evidence.
Hayes JH; Barry MJ
JAMA; 2014 Mar; 311(11):1143-9. PubMed ID: 24643604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Changes in the outcome of prostate biopsies after preventive task force recommendation against prostate-specific antigen screening.
Zakaria AS; Dragomir A; Brimo F; Kassouf W; Tanguay S; Aprikian A
BMC Urol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):69. PubMed ID: 30126402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
