These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30855184)
1. Root proximity of miniscrews at a variety of maxillary and mandibular buccal sites: An JH; Kim YI; Kim SS; Park SB; Son WS; Kim SH Angle Orthod; 2019 Jul; 89(4):611-616. PubMed ID: 30855184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anatomical consideration for optimal position of orthodontic miniscrews in the maxilla: a CBCT appraisal. Al Amri MS; Sabban HM; Alsaggaf DH; Alsulaimani FF; Al-Turki GA; Al-Zahrani MS; Zawawi KH Ann Saudi Med; 2020; 40(4):330-337. PubMed ID: 32757983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Orthodontic miniscrew failure rate and root proximity, insertion angle, bone contact length, and bone density. Watanabe H; Deguchi T; Hasegawa M; Ito M; Kim S; Takano-Yamamoto T Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 Feb; 16(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 23311659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites. Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients. Elshebiny T; Palomo JM; Baumgaertel S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):505-511. PubMed ID: 29602342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simulation of miniscrew-root distance available for molar distalization depending on the miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type. Yoon JH; Cha JY; Choi YJ; Park WS; Han SS; Lee KJ PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239759. PubMed ID: 32970759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Buccal cortical bone thickness at miniscrew placement sites in patients with different vertical skeletal patterns. Veli I; Uysal T; Baysal A; Karadede I J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Nov; 75(6):417-29. PubMed ID: 25344123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone density and miniscrew stability in orthodontic patients. Samrit V; Kharbanda OP; Duggal R; Seith A; Malhotra V Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 23304969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study between currently used methods and Small Volume-Cone Beam Tomography for surgical placement of mini implants. Landin M; Jadhav A; Yadav S; Tadinada A Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 25343688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative evaluation of training method in placing miniscrews in orthodontic graduate program. Mitchell B; Liu J; Lee S; Watanabe K; Kim DG; Fields HW; Guo X; Wei-En L; Deguchi T Prog Orthod; 2022 Oct; 23(1):33. PubMed ID: 36184724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation between tooth size-arch length discrepancy and interradicular distances measured on CBCT and panoramic radiograph: an evaluation for miniscrew insertion. Tepedino M; Cornelis MA; Chimenti C; Cattaneo PM Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(5):39.e1-39.e13. PubMed ID: 30427499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Geometry of anchoring miniscrew in the lateral palate that support a tissue bone borne maxillary expander affects neighboring root damage. Oh SH; Lee SR; Choi JY; Ahn HW; Kim SH; Nelson G Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):19880. PubMed ID: 34615963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Deguchi T; Nasu M; Murakami K; Yabuuchi T; Kamioka H; Takano-Yamamoto T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):721.e7-12. PubMed ID: 16769488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption. Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of mini-implants after placement: Is root proximity a major risk factor for failure? Kim SH; Kang SM; Choi YS; Kook YA; Chung KR; Huang JC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):264-76. PubMed ID: 20816295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of anatomical sites and correlated risk factors on the survival of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mohammed H; Wafaie K; Rizk MZ; Almuzian M; Sosly R; Bearn DR Prog Orthod; 2018 Sep; 19(1):36. PubMed ID: 30246217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Root proximity and inclination of orthodontic mini-implants after placement: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation. Shinohara A; Motoyoshi M; Uchida Y; Shimizu N Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 23810045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CBCT comparison of buccal shelf bone thickness in adult Dravidian population at various sites, depths and angulation - A retrospective study. Sreenivasagan S; Sivakumar A Int Orthod; 2021 Sep; 19(3):471-479. PubMed ID: 34172417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary interradicular sites for mini-implant placement. Sawada K; Nakahara K; Matsunaga S; Abe S; Ide Y Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():1-7. PubMed ID: 22092972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation between panoramic radiography and reconstructed panoramic images from cone beam computed tomography]. Liu S; Wen F; Chen H; Liu Y Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 49(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 24697881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]