These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30855412)

  • 1. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Optical and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Glaucoma Patients and Elderly and Young Controls.
    Pillunat KR; Waibel S; Spoerl E; Herber R; Pillunat LE
    J Glaucoma; 2019 Jun; 28(6):540-545. PubMed ID: 30855412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Ultrasonic Pachymetry, Anterior Segment OCT and Noncontact Specular Microscopy.
    Scotto R; Bagnis A; Papadia M; Cutolo CA; Risso D; Traverso CE
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Oct; 26(10):860-865. PubMed ID: 28834824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of central corneal thickness in healthy eyes using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy and a high-resolution Scheimpflug camera.
    Soulantzou K; Plakitsi A; Chalkiadaki E; Anastasopoulou M; Karmiris E
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 43(2):363-370. PubMed ID: 35864284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Pentacam Scheimpflug camera with ultrasound pachymetry and noncontact specular microscopy in measuring central corneal thickness.
    Fujioka M; Nakamura M; Tatsumi Y; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
    Curr Eye Res; 2007 Feb; 32(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 17364741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness with Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.
    Erdur SK; Demirci G; Dikkaya F; Kocabora MS; Ozsutcu M
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2018; 33(6):782-787. PubMed ID: 29509052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Central corneal thickness measurements obtained with anterior segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography compared to ultrasound pachymetry in healthy subjects.
    Vollmer L; Sowka J; Pizzimenti J; Yu X
    Optometry; 2012 May; 83(5):167-72. PubMed ID: 23249119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison and evaluation of central corneal thickness using 2 new noncontact specular microscopes and conventional pachymetry devices.
    Bao F; Wang Q; Cheng S; Savini G; Lu W; Feng Y; Yu Y; Huang J
    Cornea; 2014 Jun; 33(6):576-81. PubMed ID: 24699563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by Pentacam, noncontact specular microscope, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal and post-LASIK eyes.
    Al-Ageel S; Al-Muammar AM
    Saudi J Ophthalmol; 2009 Oct; 23(3-4):181-7. PubMed ID: 23960858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.
    González-Pérez J; Queiruga Piñeiro J; Sánchez García Á; González Méijome JM
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jul; 43(7):866-872. PubMed ID: 29634372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in pachymetry for glaucoma patients.
    Ayala M; Strandås R
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 15():124. PubMed ID: 26420690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study of central corneal thickness using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound pachymetry in primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Garcia-Medina JJ; Garcia-Medina M; Garcia-Maturana C; Zanon-Moreno V; Pons-Vazquez S; Pinazo-Duran MD
    Cornea; 2013 Jan; 32(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 22495027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of Cirrus HD-OCT and Topcon SP-3000P for measuring central corneal thickness.
    Calvo-Sanz JA; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Sánchez-Tena MA
    J Optom; 2018; 11(3):192-197. PubMed ID: 28254359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparison of Central Corneal Thicknesses Measured with Two Different Methods in Cases of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.
    Adibelli FM; Oğuz H; Göncü T; Yilmaz OF; Yuksekyayla F
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2018; 33(2):167-169. PubMed ID: 27860529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement.
    Maloca PM; Studer HP; Ambrósio R; Goldblum D; Rothenbuehler S; Barthelmes D; Zweifel S; Scholl HPN; Balaskas K; Tufail A; Hasler PW
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203884. PubMed ID: 30212550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by ultrasound pachymetry, corneal topography, spectral domain- optical coherence tomography, and non-contact specular microscopy.
    Ulutas HG; Ozkaya G; Amuk Hamidi N
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Jun; 42():103527. PubMed ID: 36966866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Corneal thickness in keratoconus: comparing optical, ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography pachymetry.
    Dutta D; Rao HL; Addepalli UK; Vaddavalli PK
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Mar; 120(3):457-463. PubMed ID: 23177363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of topcon optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry.
    Northey LC; Gifford P; Boneham GC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1708-14. PubMed ID: 23190715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis of Pentacam vs. ultrasound pachymetry in central corneal thickness measurement in normal, post-LASIK or PRK, and keratoconic or keratoconus-suspect eyes.
    Wu W; Wang Y; Xu L
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 252(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 24218039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the precision of the Topcon SP-3000P specular microscope and an ultrasound pachymeter.
    Almubrad TM; Osuagwu UL; Alabbadi I; Ogbuehi KC
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2011; 5():871-6. PubMed ID: 21760714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of central corneal thickness estimated by an ultrasonic pachymeter and non-contact specular microscopy.
    Çevik SG; Duman R; Çevik MT; Kıvanç SA; Akova-Budak B; Perente I; Duman R
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2016; 79(5):312-314. PubMed ID: 27982210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.