These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30855468)

  • 1. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway supremeTM as non-inflatable cuff device and self-pressurized air-QTM in children: Randomized controlled non-inferiority study.
    Hwang J; Hong B; Kim YH; Lee WH; Jo Y; Youn S; Lim CS
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Mar; 98(10):e14746. PubMed ID: 30855468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized comparison of the i-gel with the self-pressurized air-Q intubating laryngeal airway in children.
    Kim MS; Lee JH; Han SW; Im YJ; Kang HJ; Lee JR
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2015 Apr; 25(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 25559870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.
    Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme™ and laryngeal mask airway unique™ in infants and children: does cuff pressure influence leak pressure?
    Jagannathan N; Sohn L; Sommers K; Belvis D; Shah RD; Sawardekar A; Eidem J; Dagraca J; Mukherji I
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Oct; 23(10):927-33. PubMed ID: 23521105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective, Randomized Comparison of the i-gel and the Self-Pressurized air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway in Elderly Anesthetized Patients.
    Lee JS; Kim DH; Choi SH; Ha SH; Kim S; Kim MS
    Anesth Analg; 2020 Feb; 130(2):480-487. PubMed ID: 30320644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The distance between the glottis and the cuff of a tracheal tube placed through three supraglottic airway devices in children: A randomised controlled trial.
    Lee JH; Park S; Jang YE; Kim EH; Kim HS; Kim JT
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2019 Oct; 36(10):721-727. PubMed ID: 31415305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure.
    Somri M; Vaida S; Garcia Fornari G; Mendoza GR; Charco-Mora P; Hawash N; Matter I; Swaid F; Gaitini L
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):87. PubMed ID: 27716165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-pressurized air-Q
    Ha SH; Kim MS; Suh J; Lee JS
    Can J Anaesth; 2018 May; 65(5):543-550. PubMed ID: 29524199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective randomized comparison of airway seal using the novel vision-guided insertion of LMA-Supreme® and LMA-Protector®.
    van Zundert AAJ; Wyssusek KH; Pelecanos A; Roets M; Kumar CM
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Apr; 34(2):285-294. PubMed ID: 30953222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized comparison of pediatric-sized Streamlined Liner of Pharyngeal Airway and Laryngeal Mask Airway-Unique in paralyzed children.
    Zhu W; Wei X
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2016 May; 26(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 27012370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of changing the sequence of cuff inflation and device fixation with the LMA-Supreme® on device position, ventilatory complications, and airway morbidity: a clinical and fiberscopic study.
    Bergmann I; Crozier TA; Roessler M; Schotola H; Mansur A; Büttner B; Hinz JM; Bauer M
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2014 Jan; 14():2. PubMed ID: 24387685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
    Beleña JM; Núñez M; Anta D; Carnero M; Gracia JL; Ayala JL; Alvarez R; Yuste J
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 23318811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pediatric supraglottic airway devices in clinical practice: A prospective observational study.
    Kleine-Brueggeney M; Gottfried A; Nabecker S; Greif R; Book M; Theiler L
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):119. PubMed ID: 28865448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
    Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit.
    Acx E; Van Caelenberg E; De Baerdemaeker L; Coppens M
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2021; 37(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 34349370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective evaluation of the self-pressurized air-Q intubating laryngeal airway in children.
    Jagannathan N; Sohn LE; Mankoo R; Langen KE; Roth AG; Hall SC
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2011 Jun; 21(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 21518103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomised comparison of the LMA SupremeTM and LMAProSealTM in children.
    Jagannathan N; Sohn LE; Sawardekar A; Gordon J; Langen KE; Anderson K
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):632-9. PubMed ID: 22420717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Head Rotation Reduces Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure of the i-gel and LMA® Supreme™ in Paralyzed, Anesthetized Patients: A Randomized Trial.
    Chaki T; Tachibana S; Kumita S; Sato H; Hamada K; Tokinaga Y; Yamakage M
    Anesth Analg; 2021 Mar; 132(3):818-826. PubMed ID: 32889846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomised comparison of the self-pressurised air-QTM intubating laryngeal airway with the LMA Unique™ in children.
    Jagannathan N; Sohn LE; Sawardekar A; Shah R; Ryan K; Jagannathan R; Anderson K
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Sep; 67(9):973-9. PubMed ID: 22670827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Usability and performance characteristics of the pediatric air-Q® intubating laryngeal airway.
    Whyte SD; Cooke E; Malherbe S
    Can J Anaesth; 2013 Jun; 60(6):557-63. PubMed ID: 23519724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.