136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30856133)
1. No effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on contrast sensitivity function.
He Q; Lin BR; Zhao J; Shi YZ; Yan FF; Huang CB
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2019; 37(2):109-118. PubMed ID: 30856133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.
Jamil A; Batsikadze G; Kuo HI; Labruna L; Hasan A; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
J Physiol; 2017 Feb; 595(4):1273-1288. PubMed ID: 27723104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Dyke K; Kim S; Jackson GM; Jackson SR
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on MMN-indexed auditory sensory processing.
Impey D; de la Salle S; Knott V
Brain Cogn; 2016 Jun; 105():46-54. PubMed ID: 27054908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Boosting Cognition: Effects of Multiple-Session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Working Memory.
Talsma LJ; Kroese HA; Slagter HA
J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 29(4):755-768. PubMed ID: 27897670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptive threshold hunting for the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex inhibition.
Mooney RA; Cirillo J; Byblow WD
Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jun; 236(6):1651-1663. PubMed ID: 29610948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Response variability of different anodal transcranial direct current stimulation intensities across multiple sessions.
Ammann C; Lindquist MA; Celnik PA
Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(4):757-763. PubMed ID: 28420581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.
Tremblay S; Larochelle-Brunet F; Lafleur LP; El Mouderrib S; Lepage JF; Théoret H
Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 44(5):2184-90. PubMed ID: 27336413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Delayed enhancement of multitasking performance: Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on the prefrontal cortex.
Hsu WY; Zanto TP; Anguera JA; Lin YY; Gazzaley A
Cortex; 2015 Aug; 69():175-85. PubMed ID: 26073148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of an NMDA antagonist on the auditory mismatch negativity response to transcranial direct current stimulation.
Impey D; de la Salle S; Baddeley A; Knott V
J Psychopharmacol; 2017 May; 31(5):614-624. PubMed ID: 27624152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of motor cortex does not ameliorate spasticity in multiple sclerosis.
Iodice R; Dubbioso R; Ruggiero L; Santoro L; Manganelli F
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2015; 33(4):487-92. PubMed ID: 26409407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transcranial direct current stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A randomized, controlled, partial crossover trial.
D'Urso G; Brunoni AR; Mazzaferro MP; Anastasia A; de Bartolomeis A; Mantovani A
Depress Anxiety; 2016 Dec; 33(12):1132-1140. PubMed ID: 27802585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.
Murray LM; Edwards DJ; Ruffini G; Labar D; Stampas A; Pascual-Leone A; Cortes M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PubMed ID: 25461825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
Labruna L; Jamil A; Fresnoza S; Batsikadze G; Kuo MF; Vanderschelden B; Ivry RB; Nitsche MA
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 26493498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of anodal tDCS of the lower limb M1 on ankle reaction time in young adults.
Devanathan D; Madhavan S
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 234(2):377-85. PubMed ID: 26487179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The association of motor imagery and kinesthetic illusion prolongs the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal tract excitability.
Kaneko F; Shibata E; Hayami T; Nagahata K; Aoyama T
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 13():36. PubMed ID: 27079199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transcranial direct current stimulation can selectively affect different processing channels in human visual cortex.
Costa TL; Hamer RD; Nagy BV; Barboni MT; Gualtieri M; Boggio PS; Ventura DF
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Apr; 233(4):1213-23. PubMed ID: 25600818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with neuropathic pain from spinal cord injury.
Ngernyam N; Jensen MP; Arayawichanon P; Auvichayapat N; Tiamkao S; Janjarasjitt S; Punjaruk W; Amatachaya A; Aree-uea B; Auvichayapat P
Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Feb; 126(2):382-90. PubMed ID: 25027640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What is the optimal anodal electrode position for inducing corticomotor excitability changes in transcranial direct current stimulation?
Lee M; Kim YH; Im CH; Kim JH; Park CH; Chang WH; Lee A
Neurosci Lett; 2015 Jan; 584():347-50. PubMed ID: 25450146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-definition transcranial direct-current stimulation of the right M1 further facilitates left M1 excitability during crossed facilitation.
Cabibel V; Muthalib M; Teo WP; Perrey S
J Neurophysiol; 2018 Apr; 119(4):1266-1272. PubMed ID: 29357451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
