149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30856153)
1. Investigation of AAA dose calculation algorithm accuracy in surface and buildup region for 6MV photon beam using markus parallel-plate ion chamber.
Kesen ND; Akbas U; Koksal C; Bilge H
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(2):361-369. PubMed ID: 30856153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetry of oblique tangential photon beams calculated by superposition/convolution algorithms: a Monte Carlo evaluation.
Chow JC; Jiang R; Leung MK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 12(1):3424. PubMed ID: 21330989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of OSLD and a treatment planning system for surface dose determination in IMRT treatments.
Zhuang AH; Olch AJ
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081720. PubMed ID: 25086530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical implementation and evaluation of the Acuros dose calculation algorithm.
Yan C; Combine AG; Bednarz G; Lalonde RJ; Hu B; Dickens K; Wynn R; Pavord DC; Saiful Huq M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):195-209. PubMed ID: 28834214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation.
Van Esch A; Tillikainen L; Pyykkonen J; Tenhunen M; Helminen H; Siljamäki S; Alakuijala J; Paiusco M; Lori M; Huyskens DP
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4130-48. PubMed ID: 17153392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric evaluation of photon dose calculation under jaw and MLC shielding.
Fogliata A; Clivio A; Vanetti E; Nicolini G; Belosi MF; Cozzi L
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101706. PubMed ID: 24089896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The accuracy of the pencil beam convolution and anisotropic analytical algorithms in predicting the dose effects due to attenuation from immobilization devices and large air gaps.
Gray A; Oliver LD; Johnston PN
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3181-91. PubMed ID: 19673217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Going the distance: validation of Acuros and AAA at an extended SSD of 400 cm.
Lamichhane N; Patel VN; Studenski MT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 27074473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental validation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm.
Breitman K; Rathee S; Newcomb C; Murray B; Robinson D; Field C; Warkentin H; Connors S; Mackenzie M; Dunscombe P; Fallone G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 May; 8(2):76-92. PubMed ID: 17592457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of modern dosimetry techniques near low- and high-density heterogeneities.
Alhakeem EA; AlShaikh S; Rosenfeld AB; Zavgorodni SF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):142–158. PubMed ID: 26699322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Verification of IMRT dose calculations using AAA and PBC algorithms in dose buildup regions.
Oinam AS; Singh L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 11(4):3351. PubMed ID: 21081894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A simple technique to improve calculated skin dose accuracy in a commercial treatment planning system.
Wang L; Cmelak AJ; Ding GX
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):191-197. PubMed ID: 29411506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of photon beam models in heterogeneous media of modern radiotherapy.
Ding W; Johnston PN; Wong TP; Bubb IF
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2004 Jun; 27(2):39-48. PubMed ID: 15462585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinically relevant investigation of flattening filter-free skin dose.
Guy CL; Karki K; Sharma M; Kim S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):140-148. PubMed ID: 27929489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between measured and calculated dynamic wedge dose distributions using the anisotropic analytic algorithm and pencil-beam convolution.
Caprile PF; Venencia CD; Besa P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 8(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 17592453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the dose calculation accuracy for small fields defined by jaw or MLC for AAA and Acuros XB algorithms.
Fogliata A; Lobefalo F; Reggiori G; Stravato A; Tomatis S; Scorsetti M; Cozzi L
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5685. PubMed ID: 27782735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Beam perturbation characteristics of a 2D transmission silicon diode array, Magic Plate.
Alrowaili ZA; Lerch ML; Petasecca M; Carolan MG; Metcalfe PE; Rosenfeld AB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):85-98. PubMed ID: 27074475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
