318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30856453)
1. Membrane transporter data to support kinetically-informed chemical risk assessment using non-animal methods: Scientific and regulatory perspectives.
Clerbaux LA; Paini A; Lumen A; Osman-Ponchet H; Worth AP; Fardel O
Environ Int; 2019 May; 126():659-671. PubMed ID: 30856453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Capturing the applicability of in vitro-in silico membrane transporter data in chemical risk assessment and biomedical research.
Clerbaux LA; Coecke S; Lumen A; Kliment T; Worth AP; Paini A
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 645():97-108. PubMed ID: 30015123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrated testing and intelligent assessment-new challenges under REACH.
Ahlers J; Stock F; Werschkun B
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Oct; 15(7):565-72. PubMed ID: 18818964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental chemicals as substrates, inhibitors or inducers of drug transporters: implication for toxicokinetics, toxicity and pharmacokinetics.
Fardel O; Kolasa E; Le Vee M
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2012 Jan; 8(1):29-46. PubMed ID: 22176607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: how will it affect risk assessment?
Rhomberg LR
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):361-75. PubMed ID: 20574908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-animal approaches for toxicokinetics in risk evaluations of food chemicals.
Punt A; Peijnenburg AACM; Hoogenboom RLAP; Bouwmeester H
ALTEX; 2017; 34(4):501-514. PubMed ID: 28403478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The current status of exposure-driven approaches for chemical safety assessment: A cross-sector perspective.
Sewell F; Aggarwal M; Bachler G; Broadmeadow A; Gellatly N; Moore E; Robinson S; Rooseboom M; Stevens A; Terry C; Burden N
Toxicology; 2017 Aug; 389():109-117. PubMed ID: 28774667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sourcing data on chemical properties and hazard data from the US-EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard: A practical guide for human risk assessment.
Williams AJ; Lambert JC; Thayer K; Dorne JCM
Environ Int; 2021 Sep; 154():106566. PubMed ID: 33934018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The fish embryo toxicity test as an animal alternative method in hazard and risk assessment and scientific research.
Embry MR; Belanger SE; Braunbeck TA; Galay-Burgos M; Halder M; Hinton DE; Léonard MA; Lillicrap A; Norberg-King T; Whale G
Aquat Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 97(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 20061034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implication of human drug transporters to toxicokinetics and toxicity of pesticides.
Guéniche N; Bruyere A; Le Vée M; Fardel O
Pest Manag Sci; 2020 Jan; 76(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 31392818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of new scientific developments in regulatory risk assessments: challenges and opportunities.
Tarazona JV
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e85-91. PubMed ID: 23625625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interactions of human drug transporters with chemical additives present in plastics: Potential consequences for toxicokinetics and health.
Tastet V; Le Vée M; Bruyère A; Fardel O
Environ Pollut; 2023 Aug; 331(Pt 2):121882. PubMed ID: 37236587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Human biomonitoring and toxicokinetics as key building blocks for next generation risk assessment.
Reale E; Zare Jeddi M; Paini A; Connolly A; Duca R; Cubadda F; Benfenati E; Bessems J; S Galea K; Dirven H; Santonen T; M Koch H; Jones K; Sams C; Viegas S; Kyriaki M; Campisi L; David A; Antignac JP; B Hopf N
Environ Int; 2024 Feb; 184():108474. PubMed ID: 38350256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interactions of pesticides with membrane drug transporters: implications for toxicokinetics and toxicity.
Chedik L; Bruyere A; Bacle A; Potin S; Le Vée M; Fardel O
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2018 Jul; 14(7):739-752. PubMed ID: 29886753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utilizing relative potency factors (RPF) and threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) concepts to assess hazard and human risk assessment profiles of environmental metabolites: a case study.
Terry C; Rasoulpour RJ; Knowles S; Billington R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 25584438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toxicokinetic Triage for Environmental Chemicals.
Wambaugh JF; Wetmore BA; Pearce R; Strope C; Goldsmith R; Sluka JP; Sedykh A; Tropsha A; Bosgra S; Shah I; Judson R; Thomas RS; Setzer RW
Toxicol Sci; 2015 Sep; 147(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 26085347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wind of change challenges toxicological regulators.
Tralau T; Riebeling C; Pirow R; Oelgeschläger M; Seiler A; Liebsch M; Luch A
Environ Health Perspect; 2012 Nov; 120(11):1489-94. PubMed ID: 22871563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro toxicological methods for environmental health testing.
Hasspieler BM; Haffner GD; Adeli K
Rev Environ Health; 1996; 11(4):213-27. PubMed ID: 9085437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Courage for simplification and imperfection in the 21st century assessment of "Endocrine disruption".
Dietrich DR
ALTEX; 2010; 27(4):264-78. PubMed ID: 21240469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
