These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30857161)

  • 21. A novel framework to evaluate pedestrian safety at non-signalized locations.
    Fu T; Miranda-Moreno L; Saunier N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Feb; 111():23-33. PubMed ID: 29169102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Systems-based approach to investigate unsafe pedestrian behaviour at level crossings.
    Stefanova T; Burkhardt JM; Filtness A; Wullems C; Rakotonirainy A; Delhomme P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Aug; 81():167-86. PubMed ID: 25996290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings.
    Sucha M; Dostal D; Risser R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():41-50. PubMed ID: 28259827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A study of pedestrian compliance with traffic signals for exclusive and concurrent phasing.
    Ivan JN; McKernan K; Zhang Y; Ravishanker N; Mamun SA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jan; 98():157-166. PubMed ID: 27723517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of mobile phone distraction on pedestrians' crossing behavior and visual attention allocation at a signalized intersection: An outdoor experimental study.
    Jiang K; Ling F; Feng Z; Ma C; Kumfer W; Shao C; Wang K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():170-177. PubMed ID: 29604515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Centrifugal force model for pedestrian dynamics.
    Yu WJ; Chen R; Dong LY; Dai SQ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Aug; 72(2 Pt 2):026112. PubMed ID: 16196649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gap acceptance probability model for pedestrians at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks based on logistic regression.
    Zhao J; Malenje JO; Tang Y; Han Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():76-83. PubMed ID: 31128443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The transportation safety of elderly pedestrians: Modeling contributing factors to elderly pedestrian collisions.
    Kim D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Oct; 131():268-274. PubMed ID: 31336314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Walking the talk: Comparing pedestrian 'activity as imagined' with 'activity as done'.
    Read GJM; Stevens EL; Lenné MG; Stanton NA; Walker GH; Salmon PM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():74-84. PubMed ID: 29407671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pedestrians' perceptions of walkability and safety in relation to the built environment in Cali, Colombia, 2009-10.
    Villaveces A; Nieto LA; Ortega D; Ríos JF; Medina JJ; Gutiérrez MI; Rodríguez D
    Inj Prev; 2012 Oct; 18(5):291-7. PubMed ID: 22328633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mean-field theory for pedestrian outflow through an exit.
    Yanagisawa D; Nishinari K
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2007 Dec; 76(6 Pt 1):061117. PubMed ID: 18233824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is the safety-in-numbers effect still observed in areas with low pedestrian activities? A case study of a suburban area in the United States.
    Lee J; Abdel-Aty M; Xu P; Gong Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():116-123. PubMed ID: 30739046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Community-based pedestrian safety training in virtual reality: A pragmatic trial.
    Schwebel DC; Combs T; Rodriguez D; Severson J; Sisiopiku V
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jan; 86():9-15. PubMed ID: 26479677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pedestrian safety at traffic signals: a study carried out with the help of a traffic conflicts technique.
    Gårder P
    Accid Anal Prev; 1989 Oct; 21(5):435-44. PubMed ID: 2619853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Safety impacts of platform tram stops on pedestrians in mixed traffic operation: A comparison group before-after crash study.
    Naznin F; Currie G; Logan D; Sarvi M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jan; 86():1-8. PubMed ID: 26476596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cross or wait? Pedestrian decision making during clearance phase at signalized intersections.
    Zhuang X; Wu C; Ma S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Feb; 111():115-124. PubMed ID: 29197691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Exploring patterns of child pedestrian behaviors at urban intersections.
    Gitelman V; Levi S; Carmel R; Korchatov A; Hakkert S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jan; 122():36-47. PubMed ID: 30308329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Exploring factors influencing the strength of the safety-in-numbers effect.
    Elvik R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Mar; 100():75-84. PubMed ID: 28129575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Harnessing Vehicle-to-Pedestrian (V2P) Communication Technology: Sending Traffic Warnings to Texting Pedestrians.
    Rahimian P; O'Neal EE; Zhou S; Plumert JM; Kearney JK
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):833-843. PubMed ID: 29920115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Walking the line: Understanding pedestrian behaviour and risk at rail level crossings with cognitive work analysis.
    Read GJ; Salmon PM; Lenné MG; Stanton NA
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt A():209-27. PubMed ID: 26518501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.