442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30857995)
1. Diagnostic Importance of Axial Loaded Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Suspected Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.
Sasani H; Solmaz B; Sasani M; Vural M; Ozer AF
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():e69-e75. PubMed ID: 30857995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography?
Kanno H; Endo T; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Itoi E; Ishii Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E985-92. PubMed ID: 21258271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of listhesis on upright radiographs and central lumbar spinal canal stenosis on supine MRI: is it possible to predict lumbar spinal canal stenosis?
Finkenstaedt T; Del Grande F; Bolog N; Ulrich NH; Tok S; Burgstaller JM; Steurer J; Chung CB; Andreisek G; Winklhofer S;
Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Sep; 47(9):1269-1275. PubMed ID: 29651713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in dural sac caliber with standing MRI improve correlation with symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Lau YYO; Lee RKL; Griffith JF; Chan CLY; Law SW; Kwok KO
Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2666-2675. PubMed ID: 28702785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation Between Dural Sac Size in Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Symptoms in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Zhou Z; Jin Z; Zhang P; Shan B; Zhou Z; Zhang Y; Deng Y; Zhou X
World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():e866-e873. PubMed ID: 31715409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of body position and axial load on spinal canal morphology: an MRI study of central spinal stenosis.
Madsen R; Jensen TS; Pope M; Sørensen JS; Bendix T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18165750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic effects on the lumbar spinal canal: axially loaded CT-myelography and MRI in patients with sciatica and/or neurogenic claudication.
Willén J; Danielson B; Gaulitz A; Niklason T; Schönström N; Hansson T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Dec; 22(24):2968-76. PubMed ID: 9431634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lumbosacral spinal compression device with the use of a cushion back support in supine MRI.
Sungkarat W; Laothamatas J; Worapruekjaru L; Hooncharoen B; Charoensuk J; Chousangsuntorn K
Acta Radiol; 2021 Aug; 62(8):1052-1062. PubMed ID: 32854529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting disability and physical function in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis of L4-5: evaluation with axially loaded MRI.
Huang KY; Lin RM; Lee YL; Li JD
Eur Spine J; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1851-7. PubMed ID: 19526378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic advancement of axial loaded lumbar spine MRI in patients with clinically suspected central spinal canal stenosis.
Kim YK; Lee JW; Kim HJ; Yeom JS; Kang HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(21):E1342-7. PubMed ID: 23797506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic value of a new axial loading MRI device in patients with suspected lumbar spinal stenosis.
Fang X; Li J; Wang L; Liu L; Lv W; Tang Z; Gao D
Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3200-3210. PubMed ID: 36814030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between lumbar spinal stenosis and axial muscle wasting.
Schönnagel L; Zhu J; Camino-Willhuber G; Guven AE; Tani S; Caffard T; Haffer H; Muellner M; Chiapparelli E; Arzani A; Amoroso K; Moser M; Shue J; Tan ET; Carrino JA; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
Spine J; 2024 Feb; 24(2):231-238. PubMed ID: 37788745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of two methods to evaluate a narrow spinal canal: routine magnetic resonance imaging versus three-dimensional reconstruction.
Macedo LG; Bodnar A; Battié MC
Spine J; 2016 Jul; 16(7):884-8. PubMed ID: 27032898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of lumbar canal stenosis: decubitus imaging methods versus flexion-extension myelography and surface measurements versus the diameter of the dural sac].
Coulier B
JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 10859898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conventional Supine MRI With a Lumbar Pillow-An Alternative to Weight-bearing MRI for Diagnosing Spinal Stenosis?: A Cross-sectional Study.
Hansen BB; Hansen P; Grindsted J; Rasti Z; Bliddal H; Riis RGC; Boesen M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 May; 42(9):662-669. PubMed ID: 27584675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Axial loading during supine MRI for improved assessment of lumbar spine: comparison with standing MRI.
Charoensuk J; Laothamatas J; Sungkarat W; Worapruekjaru L; Hooncharoen B; Chousangsuntorn K
Acta Radiol; 2023 Jan; 64(1):217-227. PubMed ID: 34939453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increased Facet Fluid Predicts Dynamic Changes in the Dural Sac Size on Axial-Loaded MRI in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.
Kanno H; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Aizawa T; Itoi E
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Apr; 37(4):730-5. PubMed ID: 26564439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Axially loaded magnetic resonance image of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic individuals.
Danielson B; Willén J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Dec; 26(23):2601-6. PubMed ID: 11725242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic MR in patients affected by neurogenical claudication: technique and results from a single-center experience.
Muto M; Giurazza F; Guarnieri G; Senese R; Schena E; Zeccolini F; Diano A
Neuroradiology; 2016 Aug; 58(8):765-70. PubMed ID: 27209418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.
Singh K; Samartzis D; Vaccaro AR; Nassr A; Andersson GB; Yoon ST; Phillips FM; Goldberg EJ; An HS
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 16291100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
