These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30858039)

  • 41. Evaluation of an interactive case simulation system in dermatology and venereology for medical students.
    Wahlgren CF; Edelbring S; Fors U; Hindbeck H; Ståhle M
    BMC Med Educ; 2006 Aug; 6():40. PubMed ID: 16907972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Investigating the use of quick response codes in the gross anatomy laboratory.
    Traser CJ; Hoffman LA; Seifert MF; Wilson AB
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 25288343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) versus traditional textbook methods for training in abdominal examination (Japanese experience).
    Qayumi AK; Kurihara Y; Imai M; Pachev G; Seo H; Hoshino Y; Cheifetz R; Matsuura K; Momoi M; Saleem M; Lara-Guerra H; Miki Y; Kariya Y
    Med Educ; 2004 Oct; 38(10):1080-8. PubMed ID: 15461653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Digital learning and teaching in medical education : Already there or still at the beginning?].
    Kuhn S; Frankenhauser S; Tolks D
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2018 Feb; 61(2):201-209. PubMed ID: 29234823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Teaching neuroanatomy using computer-aided learning: What makes for successful outcomes?
    Svirko E; Mellanby J
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):560-569. PubMed ID: 28431201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Rheumatology training for medical students. Comparison of learning success and acceptance with virtual vs. real patient demonstrations].
    Madl C; Keyßer G
    Z Rheumatol; 2015 Feb; 74(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 25518966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The integration of an anatomy massive open online course (MOOC) into a medical anatomy curriculum.
    Swinnerton BJ; Morris NP; Hotchkiss S; Pickering JD
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 27315160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Learning management system and e-learning tools: an experience of medical students' usage and expectations.
    Back DA; Behringer F; Haberstroh N; Ehlers JP; Sostmann K; Peters H
    Int J Med Educ; 2016 Aug; 7():267-73. PubMed ID: 27544782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A randomised controlled trial of blended learning to improve the newborn examination skills of medical students.
    Stewart A; Inglis G; Jardine L; Koorts P; Davies MW
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2013 Mar; 98(2):F141-4. PubMed ID: 22684155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Does blended problem-based learning make Asian medical students active learners?: a prospective comparative study.
    Shimizu I; Nakazawa H; Sato Y; Wolfhagen IHAP; Könings KD
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 May; 19(1):147. PubMed ID: 31092243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Does teaching style matter? A randomised trial of group discussion versus lectures in orthopaedic undergraduate teaching.
    Costa ML; van Rensburg L; Rushton N
    Med Educ; 2007 Feb; 41(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 17269956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Development and evaluation of an internet-based blended-learning module in biomedicine for university applicants--Education as a challenge for the future.
    Klümper C; Neunzehn J; Wegmann U; Kruppke B; Joos U; Wiesmann HP
    Head Face Med; 2016 Mar; 12():13. PubMed ID: 27013322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
    Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The relevance of low-fidelity virtual reality simulators compared with other learning methods in basic endovascular skills training.
    Aeckersberg G; Gkremoutis A; Schmitz-Rixen T; Kaiser E
    J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jan; 69(1):227-235. PubMed ID: 30579447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A randomised controlled trial of a blended learning education intervention for teaching evidence-based medicine.
    Ilic D; Nordin RB; Glasziou P; Tilson JK; Villanueva E
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 15():39. PubMed ID: 25884717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Flipped classroom frameworks improve efficacy in undergraduate practical courses - a quasi-randomized pilot study in otorhinolaryngology.
    Dombrowski T; Wrobel C; Dazert S; Volkenstein S
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Dec; 18(1):294. PubMed ID: 30514278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Measuring learning gain: Comparing anatomy drawing screencasts and paper-based resources.
    Pickering JD
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jul; 10(4):307-316. PubMed ID: 27922727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Acute medicine teaching in an undergraduate medical curriculum: a blended learning approach.
    Shah IM; Walters MR; McKillop JH
    Emerg Med J; 2008 Jun; 25(6):354-7. PubMed ID: 18499818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Improved student learning in ophthalmology with computer-aided instruction.
    Devitt P; Smith JR; Palmer E
    Eye (Lond); 2001 Oct; 15(Pt 5):635-9. PubMed ID: 11702976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Computer model for the cardiovascular system: development of an e-learning tool for teaching of medical students.
    Warriner DR; Bayley M; Shi Y; Lawford PV; Narracott A; Fenner J
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Nov; 17(1):220. PubMed ID: 29157229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.