361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30858580)
1. Best practices for benchmarking germline small-variant calls in human genomes.
Krusche P; Trigg L; Boutros PC; Mason CE; De La Vega FM; Moore BL; Gonzalez-Porta M; Eberle MA; Tezak Z; Lababidi S; Truty R; Asimenos G; Funke B; Fleharty M; Chapman BA; Salit M; Zook JM;
Nat Biotechnol; 2019 May; 37(5):555-560. PubMed ID: 30858580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benchmarking workflows to assess performance and suitability of germline variant calling pipelines in clinical diagnostic assays.
Krishnan V; Utiramerur S; Ng Z; Datta S; Snyder MP; Ashley EA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Feb; 22(1):85. PubMed ID: 33627090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. vcfdist: accurately benchmarking phased small variant calls in human genomes.
Dunn T; Narayanasamy S
Nat Commun; 2023 Dec; 14(1):8149. PubMed ID: 38071244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consensus Genotyper for Exome Sequencing (CGES): improving the quality of exome variant genotypes.
Trubetskoy V; Rodriguez A; Dave U; Campbell N; Crawford EL; Cook EH; Sutcliffe JS; Foster I; Madduri R; Cox NJ; Davis LK
Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 25270638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SMaSH: a benchmarking toolkit for human genome variant calling.
Talwalkar A; Liptrap J; Newcomb J; Hartl C; Terhorst J; Curtis K; Bresler M; Song YS; Jordan MI; Patterson D
Bioinformatics; 2014 Oct; 30(19):2787-95. PubMed ID: 24894505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An open resource for accurately benchmarking small variant and reference calls.
Zook JM; McDaniel J; Olson ND; Wagner J; Parikh H; Heaton H; Irvine SA; Trigg L; Truty R; McLean CY; De La Vega FM; Xiao C; Sherry S; Salit M
Nat Biotechnol; 2019 May; 37(5):561-566. PubMed ID: 30936564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery.
Barbitoff YA; Abasov R; Tvorogova VE; Glotov AS; Predeus AV
BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):155. PubMed ID: 35193511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ReliableGenome: annotation of genomic regions with high/low variant calling concordance.
Popitsch N; ; Schuh A; Taylor JC
Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):155-160. PubMed ID: 27605105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic comparison of variant calling pipelines using gold standard personal exome variants.
Hwang S; Kim E; Lee I; Marcotte EM
Sci Rep; 2015 Dec; 5():17875. PubMed ID: 26639839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quartet DNA reference materials and datasets for comprehensively evaluating germline variant calling performance.
Ren L; Duan X; Dong L; Zhang R; Yang J; Gao Y; Peng R; Hou W; Liu Y; Li J; Yu Y; Zhang N; Shang J; Liang F; Wang D; Chen H; Sun L; Hao L; ; Scherer A; Nordlund J; Xiao W; Xu J; Tong W; Hu X; Jia P; Ye K; Li J; Jin L; Hong H; Wang J; Fan S; Fang X; Zheng Y; Shi L
Genome Biol; 2023 Nov; 24(1):270. PubMed ID: 38012772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Challenges in exome analysis by LifeScope and its alternative computational pipelines.
Pranckevičiene E; Rančelis T; Pranculis A; Kučinskas V
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():421. PubMed ID: 26346699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variant calling and benchmarking in an era of complete human genome sequences.
Olson ND; Wagner J; Dwarshuis N; Miga KH; Sedlazeck FJ; Salit M; Zook JM
Nat Rev Genet; 2023 Jul; 24(7):464-483. PubMed ID: 37059810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. BAYSIC: a Bayesian method for combining sets of genome variants with improved specificity and sensitivity.
Cantarel BL; Weaver D; McNeill N; Zhang J; Mackey AJ; Reese J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Apr; 15():104. PubMed ID: 24725768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. svclassify: a method to establish benchmark structural variant calls.
Parikh H; Mohiyuddin M; Lam HY; Iyer H; Chen D; Pratt M; Bartha G; Spies N; Losert W; Zook JM; Salit M
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():64. PubMed ID: 26772178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A reference data set of 5.4 million phased human variants validated by genetic inheritance from sequencing a three-generation 17-member pedigree.
Eberle MA; Fritzilas E; Krusche P; Källberg M; Moore BL; Bekritsky MA; Iqbal Z; Chuang HY; Humphray SJ; Halpern AL; Kruglyak S; Margulies EH; McVean G; Bentley DR
Genome Res; 2017 Jan; 27(1):157-164. PubMed ID: 27903644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Set-theory based benchmarking of three different variant callers for targeted sequencing.
Molina-Mora JA; Solano-Vargas M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):20. PubMed ID: 33413082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detailed simulation of cancer exome sequencing data reveals differences and common limitations of variant callers.
Hofmann AL; Behr J; Singer J; Kuipers J; Beisel C; Schraml P; Moch H; Beerenwinkel N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 28049408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of post-alignment processing in variant discovery from whole exome data.
Tian S; Yan H; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):403. PubMed ID: 27716037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance assessment of variant calling pipelines using human whole exome sequencing and simulated data.
Kumaran M; Subramanian U; Devarajan B
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):342. PubMed ID: 31208315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comprehensive benchmarking of SNV callers for highly admixed tumor data.
Bohnert R; Vivas S; Jansen G
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186175. PubMed ID: 29020110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
