442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30859285)
21. Intratumoral heterogeneity of (18)F-FDG uptake predicts survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Hyun SH; Kim HS; Choi SH; Choi DW; Lee JK; Lee KH; Park JO; Lee KH; Kim BT; Choi JY
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Jul; 43(8):1461-8. PubMed ID: 26872788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET-CT for patients with advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].
Ding CY; Guo Z; Sun J; Yang WP; Li TR
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 40(7):528-533. PubMed ID: 30060362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The relation between staging fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomog- raphy/computed tomography metabolic parameters and tumor necrosis rate in pediatric osteosarcoma patients.
Fidan AK; Uçmak G; Demirel BB; Efetürk H; Öztürk İ; Demirtaş Şenlik S; Esen Akkaş B; Ergürhan İlhan İ
Turk J Med Sci; 2021 Jun; 51(3):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 33387988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prediction of Chemotherapy Response of Osteosarcoma Using Baseline
Jeong SY; Kim W; Byun BH; Kong CB; Song WS; Lim I; Lim SM; Woo SK
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2019; 2019():3515080. PubMed ID: 31427908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prognostic value of total lesion glycolysis of baseline 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Zhou M; Chen Y; Huang H; Zhou X; Liu J; Huang G
Oncotarget; 2016 Dec; 7(50):83544-83553. PubMed ID: 27835875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Texture analysis for chemotherapy response evaluation in osteosarcoma using MR imaging.
Baidya Kayal E; Kandasamy D; Khare K; Bakhshi S; Sharma R; Mehndiratta A
NMR Biomed; 2021 Feb; 34(2):e4426. PubMed ID: 33078438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Volume-based parameters of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography improve outcome prediction in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer after surgical resection.
Hyun SH; Choi JY; Kim K; Kim J; Shim YM; Um SW; Kim H; Lee KH; Kim BT
Ann Surg; 2013 Feb; 257(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 22968069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28.
Mantziari S; Pomoni A; Prior JO; Winiker M; Allemann P; Demartines N; Schäfer M
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 31969127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Complete Metabolic Response on Interim
Chen S; Ibrahim NK; Yan Y; Wong ST; Wang H; Wong FC
Oncologist; 2017 May; 22(5):526-534. PubMed ID: 28377466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Measurement of tumor volume by PET to evaluate prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated by non-surgical therapy.
Yan H; Wang R; Zhao F; Zhu K; Jiang S; Zhao W; Feng R
Acta Radiol; 2011 Jul; 52(6):646-50. PubMed ID: 21508201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Predictive value of initial FDG-PET features for treatment response and survival in esophageal cancer patients treated with chemo-radiation therapy using a random forest classifier.
Desbordes P; Ruan S; Modzelewski R; Pineau P; Vauclin S; Gouel P; Michel P; Di Fiore F; Vera P; Gardin I
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173208. PubMed ID: 28282392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intratumor Heterogeneity Assessed by
Lue KH; Wu YF; Liu SH; Hsieh TC; Chuang KS; Lin HH; Chen YH
Acad Radiol; 2020 Aug; 27(8):e183-e192. PubMed ID: 31761665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prognostic role of baseline
Albano D; Bosio G; Camoni L; Farina M; Re A; Tucci A; Giubbini R; Bertagna F
Hematol Oncol; 2019 Feb; 37(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30299563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effectiveness of
Liu F; Zhang Q; Zhou D; Dong J
BMC Cancer; 2019 Apr; 19(1):323. PubMed ID: 30953476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET-CT metabolic parameters in patients with advanced extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma].
Wu LL; Liang JH; Wang L; Xu W; Ding CY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 41(11):831-836. PubMed ID: 31770850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Role of
Akimoto E; Kadoya T; Kajitani K; Emi A; Shigematsu H; Ohara M; Masumoto N; Okada M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Feb; 18(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 28993056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prognostic Value of Volumetric Parameters Measured by Pretreatment 18F FDG PET/CT in Patients With Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma.
Son SH; Kang SM; Jeong SY; Lee SW; Lee SJ; Lee J; Ahn BC
Clin Nucl Med; 2016 Jun; 41(6):e266-73. PubMed ID: 27055144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Application of a Machine Learning Approach for the Analysis of Clinical and Radiomic Features of Pretreatment [
Nakajo M; Jinguji M; Tani A; Kikuno H; Hirahara D; Togami S; Kobayashi H; Yoshiura T
Mol Imaging Biol; 2021 Oct; 23(5):756-765. PubMed ID: 33763816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. 18F-FDG PET response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma are different.
Gaston LL; Di Bella C; Slavin J; Hicks RJ; Choong PF
Skeletal Radiol; 2011 Aug; 40(8):1007-15. PubMed ID: 21298431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
