503 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30860572)
1. Assessment of metagenomic assemblers based on hybrid reads of real and simulated metagenomic sequences.
Wang Z; Wang Y; Fuhrman JA; Sun F; Zhu S
Brief Bioinform; 2020 May; 21(3):777-790. PubMed ID: 30860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hybrid metagenomic assembly enables high-resolution analysis of resistance determinants and mobile elements in human microbiomes.
Bertrand D; Shaw J; Kalathiyappan M; Ng AHQ; Kumar MS; Li C; Dvornicic M; Soldo JP; Koh JY; Tong C; Ng OT; Barkham T; Young B; Marimuthu K; Chng KR; Sikic M; Nagarajan N
Nat Biotechnol; 2019 Aug; 37(8):937-944. PubMed ID: 31359005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Practical evaluation of 11 de novo assemblers in metagenome assembly.
Forouzan E; Shariati P; Mousavi Maleki MS; Karkhane AA; Yakhchali B
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Aug; 151():99-105. PubMed ID: 29953874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of long- and short-read metagenomic assembly for low-abundance species and resistance genes.
Yorki S; Shea T; Cuomo CA; Walker BJ; LaRocque RC; Manson AL; Earl AM; Worby CJ
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Mar; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 36804804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utilization of defined microbial communities enables effective evaluation of meta-genomic assemblies.
Greenwald WW; Klitgord N; Seguritan V; Yooseph S; Venter JC; Garner C; Nelson KE; Li W
BMC Genomics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):296. PubMed ID: 28407798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metagenomic assembly through the lens of validation: recent advances in assessing and improving the quality of genomes assembled from metagenomes.
Olson ND; Treangen TJ; Hill CM; Cepeda-Espinoza V; Ghurye J; Koren S; Pop M
Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jul; 20(4):1140-1150. PubMed ID: 28968737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Critical Assessment of Short-Read Assemblers for the Metagenomic Identification of Foodborne and Waterborne Pathogens Using Simulated Bacterial Communities.
Chen Z; Meng J
Microorganisms; 2022 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 36557669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. LMAS: evaluating metagenomic short de novo assembly methods through defined communities.
Mendes CI; Vila-Cerqueira P; Motro Y; Moran-Gilad J; Carriço JA; Ramirez M
Gigascience; 2022 Dec; 12():. PubMed ID: 36576131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Critical evaluation of short, long, and hybrid assembly for contextual analysis of antibiotic resistance genes in complex environmental metagenomes.
Brown CL; Keenum IM; Dai D; Zhang L; Vikesland PJ; Pruden A
Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):3753. PubMed ID: 33580146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Advancing metagenome-assembled genome-based pathogen identification: unraveling the power of long-read assembly algorithms in Oxford Nanopore sequencing.
Chen Z; Grim CJ; Ramachandran P; Meng J
Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0011724. PubMed ID: 38687063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Generation and application of pseudo-long reads for metagenome assembly.
Sim M; Lee J; Wy S; Park N; Lee D; Kwon D; Kim J
Gigascience; 2022 May; 11():. PubMed ID: 35579554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fragmentation and Coverage Variation in Viral Metagenome Assemblies, and Their Effect in Diversity Calculations.
García-López R; Vázquez-Castellanos JF; Moya A
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():141. PubMed ID: 26442255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benchmarking genome assembly methods on metagenomic sequencing data.
Zhang Z; Yang C; Veldsman WP; Fang X; Zhang L
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Mar; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 36917471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. InteMAP: Integrated metagenomic assembly pipeline for NGS short reads.
Lai B; Wang F; Wang X; Duan L; Zhu H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 16():244. PubMed ID: 26250558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth.
Peng Y; Leung HC; Yiu SM; Chin FY
Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 28(11):1420-8. PubMed ID: 22495754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating
Vosloo S; Huo L; Anderson CL; Dai Z; Sevillano M; Pinto A
Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0143421. PubMed ID: 34730411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Faucet: streaming de novo assembly graph construction.
Rozov R; Goldshlager G; Halperin E; Shamir R
Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 34(1):147-154. PubMed ID: 29036597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating long-read de novo assembly tools for eukaryotic genomes: insights and considerations.
Cosma BM; Shirali Hossein Zade R; Jordan EN; van Lent P; Peng C; Pillay S; Abeel T
Gigascience; 2022 Dec; 12():. PubMed ID: 38000912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comprehensive investigation of metagenome assembly by linked-read sequencing.
Zhang L; Fang X; Liao H; Zhang Z; Zhou X; Han L; Chen Y; Qiu Q; Li SC
Microbiome; 2020 Nov; 8(1):156. PubMed ID: 33176883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of nine popular de novo assemblers in microbial genome assembly.
Forouzan E; Maleki MSM; Karkhane AA; Yakhchali B
J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Dec; 143():32-37. PubMed ID: 28939423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
