These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30861277)

  • 21. Optimizing the MLC model parameters for IMRT in the RayStation treatment planning system.
    Chen S; Yi BY; Yang X; Xu H; Prado KL; D'Souza WD
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):322–332. PubMed ID: 26699315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Monaco treatment planning system algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation for small fields in anthropomorphic RANDO phantom: The esophagus case.
    Tugrul T
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(6):1370-1375. PubMed ID: 34916367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Automatic CT simulation optimization for radiation therapy: A general strategy.
    Li H; Yu L; Anastasio MA; Chen HC; Tan J; Gay H; Michalski JM; Low DA; Mutic S
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031913. PubMed ID: 24593731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Optimization for Acceptable and Remaining-One Unacceptable Dose-Volume and Mean-Dose Constraint Planning.
    Nakada R; Abou Al-Ola OM; Yoshinaga T
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2020; 2020():3096067. PubMed ID: 32963584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A multicriteria framework with voxel-dependent parameters for radiotherapy treatment plan optimization.
    Zarepisheh M; Uribe-Sanchez AF; Li N; Jia X; Jiang SB
    Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041705. PubMed ID: 24694125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Integrating Mathematical Modeling into the Roadmap for Personalized Adaptive Radiation Therapy.
    Enderling H; Alfonso JCL; Moros E; Caudell JJ; Harrison LB
    Trends Cancer; 2019 Aug; 5(8):467-474. PubMed ID: 31421904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A strategy to objectively evaluate the necessity of correcting detected target deviations in image guided radiotherapy.
    Yue NJ; Kim S; Jabbour S; Narra V; Haffty BG
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4340-7. PubMed ID: 18072499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Application of constrained optimization to radiotherapy planning.
    Sauer OA; Shepard DM; Mackie TR
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2359-66. PubMed ID: 10587217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) for better target volume definition in radiation therapy planning.
    Vila A; Sánchez-Reyes A; Conill C; Gispert JD; Trampal C; Láinez C; Vayreda J; Pedro A
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2010 May; 12(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 20466621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
    Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radiation transport calculations in treatment planning.
    Williamson JF
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1989; 13(3):251-68. PubMed ID: 2655878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Probability dynamics of a repopulating tumor in case of fractionated external radiotherapy.
    Stavreva N; Stavrev P; Fallone BG
    Phys Med; 2009 Dec; 25(4):181-91. PubMed ID: 19345599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of three inverse treatment planning algorithms.
    Holmes T; Mackie TR
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Jan; 39(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 7652002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Semi-automated radiotherapy treatment planning with a mathematical model to satisfy treatment goals.
    Powlis WD; Altschuler MD; Censor Y; Buhle EL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1989 Jan; 16(1):271-6. PubMed ID: 2912950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Technical note: dose-volume histogram analysis in radiotherapy using the Gaussian error function.
    Chow JC; Markel D; Jiang R
    Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1398-402. PubMed ID: 18491534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robust Optimization of SBRT Planning for Patients With Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
    Shang H; Pu Y; Wang Y
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2020; 19():1533033820916505. PubMed ID: 32314663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modeling simulation and visualization of conformal 3D lung tumor dosimetry.
    Santhanam A; Willoughby TR; Meeks SL; Rolland JP; Kupelian PA
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6165-80. PubMed ID: 19794245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating random patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
    Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher MS; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3880-90. PubMed ID: 19810460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A TCP model incorporating setup uncertainty and tumor cell density variation in microscopic extension to guide treatment planning.
    Jin JY; Kong FM; Liu D; Ren L; Li H; Zhong H; Movsas B; Chetty IJ
    Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):439-48. PubMed ID: 21361212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A feasibility study of dynamic adaptive radiotherapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer.
    Kim M; Phillips MH
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2153. PubMed ID: 27147327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.