120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30861649)
1. [Impact of diverse shapes of prostatic apex on positive apical margin rate and biochemical recurrence following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy].
Liang YC; Xu N; Wu YP; Chen DN; Wei Y; Xue XY; Huang JB; Zheng QS
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 57(3):200-205. PubMed ID: 30861649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of Variations in Prostatic Apex Shape on Apical Margin Positive Rate After Radical Prostatectomy: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy vs Open Radical Prostatectomy.
Yu YD; Lee M; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE; Lee S
J Endourol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 29212368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implications of greater short-term PSA recurrence with laparoscopic as compared to retropubic radical prostatectomy for Japanese clinically localized prostate carcinomas.
Akita H; Okamura T; Ando R; Nagata D; Naruyama H; Yamada Y; Naiki T; Yasui T; Tozawa K; Kohri K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(11):2959-61. PubMed ID: 22393971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gleason Pattern 5 is a Possible Pathologic Predictor for Biochemical Recurrence after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.
Ikeda M; Amano N; Sakata Y; Honda T; Tachibana T; Hirano S; Yamashita H; Ishii J; Irie A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Mar; 20(3):783-788. PubMed ID: 30909685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of biochemical recurrence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Bejrananda T; Pliensiri P
BMC Urol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):183. PubMed ID: 37953250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preoperative predictive factors and further risk stratification of biochemical recurrence in clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer.
Hamada R; Nakashima J; Ohori M; Ohno Y; Komori O; Yoshioka K; Tachibana M
Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 21(3):595-600. PubMed ID: 26585896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Perioperative parameters and prognosis analysis of patients aged 80 years or older treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer].
Zhang F; Zhang SD; Xiao CL; Huang Y; Ma LL
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Oct; 50(5):822-827. PubMed ID: 30337742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Martin SK; Amling CL; Zincke H
Urology; 1997 Nov; 50(5):733-9. PubMed ID: 9372884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence following radical perineal prostatectomy in a large contemporary series: a detailed assessment of margin extent and location.
Sammon JD; Trinh QD; Sukumar S; Ravi P; Friedman A; Sun M; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Jeong W; Mander N; Peabody JO; Karakiewicz PI; Harris M
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1470-6. PubMed ID: 22534086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tumor volume, surgical margin, and the risk of biochemical recurrence in men with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Song C; Kang T; Yoo S; Jeong IG; Ro JY; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
Urol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 31(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 21719325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Effects of urethral fibrosis on urinary control after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy].
Liang YC; Wu YP; Cai H; Cheng SH; Wei Y; Xue XY; Zheng QS; Huang JB; Lin YZ; Xu N
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 98(14):1099-1102. PubMed ID: 29690723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.
Huang JG; Pedersen J; Hong MK; Harewood LM; Peters J; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 23350712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrospective Cohort Analysis from a High-Volume Center of Prognostic Factors Affecting Biochemical Relapse in Patients with Encapsulated, Margin-Negative, Isolated Seminal Vesicle Invasion After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Novel Study.
Bajpai RR; Razdan S; Sanchez-Gonzalez MA; Razdan S
J Endourol; 2020 Apr; 34(4):441-449. PubMed ID: 31989836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
