These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30862529)
1. Hands-on defibrillation with a safety barrier: An analysis of potential risk to rescuers. Wight JA; Iravanian S; Haouzi AA; Lloyd MS Resuscitation; 2019 May; 138():110-113. PubMed ID: 30862529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hands-on defibrillation with safety drapes: Analysis of compressions and an alternate current pathway. Wight JA; Bigham TE; Hanson PR; Zahid A; Iravanian S; Perkins PE; Lloyd MS Am J Emerg Med; 2022 Feb; 52():132-136. PubMed ID: 34922232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hands-on defibrillation: an analysis of electrical current flow through rescuers in direct contact with patients during biphasic external defibrillation. Lloyd MS; Heeke B; Walter PF; Langberg JJ Circulation; 2008 May; 117(19):2510-4. PubMed ID: 18458166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized control hands-on defibrillation study-Barrier use evaluation. Wampler D; Kharod C; Bolleter S; Burkett A; Gabehart C; Manifold C Resuscitation; 2016 Jun; 103():37-40. PubMed ID: 27036661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Will medical examination gloves protect rescuers from defibrillation voltages during hands-on defibrillation? Sullivan JL; Chapman FW Resuscitation; 2012 Dec; 83(12):1467-72. PubMed ID: 22925991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hands-on defibrillation has the potential to improve the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and is safe for rescuers-a preclinical study. Neumann T; Gruenewald M; Lauenstein C; Drews T; Iden T; Meybohm P J Am Heart Assoc; 2012 Oct; 1(5):e001313. PubMed ID: 23316286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hands-on defibrillation during active chest compressions: eliminating another interruption. Brady W; Berlat JA Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Nov; 34(11):2172-2176. PubMed ID: 27645811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimal interruption of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for a single shock as mandated by automated external defibrillations does not compromise outcomes in a porcine model of cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Ristagno G; Tang W; Russell JK; Jorgenson D; Wang H; Sun S; Weil MH Crit Care Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):3048-53. PubMed ID: 18824916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of compressor-administered defibrillation on peri-shock pauses in a simulated cardiac arrest scenario. Glick J; Lehman E; Terndrup T West J Emerg Med; 2014 Mar; 15(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 24672620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A focused investigation of expedited, stack of three shocks versus chest compressions first followed by single shocks for monitored ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia cardiopulmonary arrest in an in-hospital setting. Davis D; Aguilar SA; Sell R; Minokadeh A; Husa R J Hosp Med; 2016 Apr; 11(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 26510012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hands-on defibrillation and electrocardiogram artefact filtering technology increases chest compression fraction and decreases peri-shock pause duration in a simulation model of cardiac arrest. Fernando SM; Cheskes S; Howes D CJEM; 2016 Jul; 18(4):270-5. PubMed ID: 26608543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]