These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30863898)

  • 21. Adherence to CONSORT Items in Randomized Controlled Trials of Integrative Medicine for Colorectal Cancer Published in Chinese Journals.
    Chen M; Cui J; Zhang AL; Sze DM; Xue CC; May BH
    J Altern Complement Med; 2018 Feb; 24(2):115-124. PubMed ID: 29068694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality of conduct and reporting of meta-analyses of surgical interventions.
    Adie S; Ma D; Harris IA; Naylor JM; Craig JC
    Ann Surg; 2015 Apr; 261(4):685-94. PubMed ID: 25575252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Epidemiology Characteristics, Methodological Assessment and Reporting of Statistical Analysis of Network Meta-Analyses in the Field of Cancer.
    Ge L; Tian JH; Li XX; Song F; Li L; Zhang J; Li G; Pei GQ; Qiu X; Yang KH
    Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():37208. PubMed ID: 27848997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reporting quality in abstracts of meta-analyses of depression screening tool accuracy: a review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Rice DB; Kloda LA; Shrier I; Thombs BD
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e012867. PubMed ID: 27864250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Epidemiology, methodological and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of nursing interventions published in China.
    Shi C; Zhu L; Wang X; Qin C; Xu Q; Tian J
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):689-700. PubMed ID: 25532885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of meta-analyses of observational studies published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang ZW; Cheng J; Liu Z; Ma JC; Li JL; Wang J; Yang KH
    BMJ Open; 2015 Dec; 5(12):e008066. PubMed ID: 26644119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Methodological quality and reporting of systematic reviews in hand and wrist pathology.
    Wasiak J; Shen AY; Ware R; O'Donohoe TJ; Faggion CM
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2017 Oct; 42(8):852-856. PubMed ID: 28610464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Endodontics.
    Nagendrababu V; Pulikkotil SJ; Sultan OS; Jayaraman J; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2018 Jun; 44(6):903-913. PubMed ID: 29602531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality of reporting of chemotherapy compliance in randomized controlled trials of breast cancer treatment.
    Altwairgi AK; Alfakeeh AH; Hopman WM; Parulekar WR
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jun; 45(6):520-6. PubMed ID: 26059696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading journals of periodontology and implant dentistry: a survey.
    Faggion CM; Giannakopoulos NN
    J Periodontol; 2012 Oct; 83(10):1251-6. PubMed ID: 22220771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Systematic Reviews in Burns Care: Poor Quality and Getting Worse.
    Campbell JM; Kavanagh S; Kurmis R; Munn Z
    J Burn Care Res; 2017; 38(2):e552-e567. PubMed ID: 28253213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis.
    Nicolau I; Ling D; Tian L; Lienhardt C; Pai M
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2013 Sep; 17(9):1160-9. PubMed ID: 23809432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quality assessment and factor analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis.
    Liu D; Jin J; Tian J; Yang K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0120911. PubMed ID: 25905713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
    Groenvold M
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar.
    Tian J; Zhang J; Ge L; Yang K; Song F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 May; 85():50-58. PubMed ID: 28063911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing the quality of reporting of observational studies in cancer.
    Papathanasiou AA; Zintzaras E
    Ann Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 20(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 20006277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reporting and methodological qualities of published surgical meta-analyses.
    Zhang H; Han J; Zhu YB; Lau WY; Schwartz ME; Xie GQ; Dai SY; Shen YN; Wu MC; Shen F; Yang T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():4-16. PubMed ID: 26117439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reporting completeness and transparency of meta-analyses of depression screening tool accuracy: A comparison of meta-analyses published before and after the PRISMA statement.
    Rice DB; Kloda LA; Shrier I; Thombs BD
    J Psychosom Res; 2016 Aug; 87():57-69. PubMed ID: 27411753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Methodological quality of meta-analyses of single-case experimental studies.
    Jamshidi L; Heyvaert M; Declercq L; Fernández-Castilla B; Ferron JM; Moeyaert M; Beretvas SN; Onghena P; Van den Noortgate W
    Res Dev Disabil; 2018 Aug; 79():97-115. PubMed ID: 29289406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Compliance of systematic reviews in veterinary journals with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) literature search reporting guidelines.
    Toews LC
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2017 Jul; 105(3):233-239. PubMed ID: 28670210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.