373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30863947)
1. Effectiveness of ring pessaries versus vaginal hysterectomy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. A cohort study.
Miceli A; Dueñas-Diez JL
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Dec; 30(12):2161-2169. PubMed ID: 30863947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of a continuous-use ring-shaped vaginal pessary without support for advanced pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women.
Dueñas JL; Miceli A
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1629-1636. PubMed ID: 29478114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Successful use of ring pessary with support for advanced pelvic organ prolapse.
Ding J; Chen C; Song XC; Zhang L; Deng M; Zhu L
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1517-23. PubMed ID: 25982787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How often should ring pessaries be removed or changed in women with advanced POP? A prospective observational study.
Miceli A; Fernández-Sánchez M; Dueñas-Díez JL
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1471-1478. PubMed ID: 33620536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in Prolapse and Urinary Symptoms After Successful Fitting of a Ring Pessary With Support in Women With Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective Study.
Ding J; Chen C; Song XC; Zhang L; Deng M; Zhu L
Urology; 2016 Jan; 87():70-5. PubMed ID: 26375847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A tailored flexible vaginal pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse in older women.
Gold RS; Baruch Y; Amir H; Gordon D; Groutz A
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2021 Sep; 69(9):2518-2523. PubMed ID: 33979457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical use of ring with support pessary for advanced pelvic organ prolapse and predictors of its short-term successful use.
Deng M; Ding J; Ai F; Zhu L
Menopause; 2017 Aug; 24(8):954-958. PubMed ID: 28419067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Which factors should be considered in choosing pessary type and size for pelvic organ prolapse patients in a fitting trial?
Ding J; Song XC; Deng M; Zhu L
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1867-1871. PubMed ID: 27260324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Successful use of the Gellhorn pessary as a second-line pessary in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse.
Deng M; Ding J; Ai F; Zhu L
Menopause; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1277-1281. PubMed ID: 28640155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prolapse surgery versus vaginal pessary in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: which factors influence the choice of treatment?
Bodner-Adler B; Bodner K; Stinglmeier A; Kimberger O; Halpern K; Koelbl H; Umek W
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Mar; 299(3):773-777. PubMed ID: 30656443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is hysterectomy or prior reconstructive surgery associated with unsuccessful initial trial of pessary fitting in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse?
Nemeth Z; Farkas N; Farkas B
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 May; 28(5):757-761. PubMed ID: 27796427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term continuations rate of ring pessary use for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse.
Manchana T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 May; 309(5):2203-2209. PubMed ID: 38189963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors associated with pessary fitting in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: A large prospective cohort study.
Ma C; Xu T; Kang J; Zhang Y; Ma Y; Liang S; Zhu L
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Nov; 39(8):2238-2245. PubMed ID: 32936968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. First-line treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and discontinuation of pessary treatment.
Umachanger JK; Marcussen ML; Bøggild H; Kjærgaard N; Glavind K
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1813-1819. PubMed ID: 32447418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors for long-term adherence to vaginal pessary in pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective study.
Niigaki DI; Silva RSP; Bortolini MAT; Fitz FF; Castro RA
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Nov; 33(11):3237-3246. PubMed ID: 35286427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk Factors for Dislodgment of Vaginal Pessaries in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Cohort Study.
Coelho SCA; Giraldo PC; de Castro EB; Brito LGO; Juliato CRT
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jan; 27(1):e247-e251. PubMed ID: 32487886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Symptomatic and anatomic improvement of pelvic organ prolapse in vaginal pessary users.
Mendes LC; Bezerra LRPS; Bilhar APM; Neto JAV; Vasconcelos CTM; Saboia DM; Karbage SAL
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr; 32(4):1023-1029. PubMed ID: 33048180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transvaginal management of severe pelvic organ prolapse in nulliparous women.
Lo TS; Jaili S; Uy-Patrimonio MC; Karim NB; Ibrahim R
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2017 Mar; 43(3):543-550. PubMed ID: 28160508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discontinuation rate and adverse events after 1 year of vaginal pessary use in women with pelvic organ prolapse.
Yimphong T; Temtanakitpaisan T; Buppasiri P; Chongsomchai C; Kanchaiyaphum S
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1123-1128. PubMed ID: 28815277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is it safe and effective to maintain the vaginal pessary without removing it for 2 consecutive years?
Miceli A; Fernández-Sánchez M; Polo-Padillo J; Dueñas-Díez JL
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Dec; 31(12):2521-2528. PubMed ID: 32062679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
