These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30864216)

  • 1. Developing and applying a deductive coding framework to assess the goals of Citizen/Community Jury deliberations.
    Scott AM; Sims R; Degeling C; Carter S; Thomas R
    Health Expect; 2019 Jun; 22(3):537-546. PubMed ID: 30864216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of information and deliberation on the consistency of preferences for prioritization in health care - evidence from discrete choice experiments undertaken alongside citizens' juries.
    Whitty JA; Littlejohns P; Ratcliffe J; Rixon K; Wilson A; Kendall E; Burton P; Chalkidou K; Scuffham PA
    J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):1237-1249. PubMed ID: 37738383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influencing health policy through public deliberation: Lessons learned from two decades of Citizens'/community juries.
    Degeling C; Rychetnik L; Street J; Thomas R; Carter SM
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Apr; 179():166-171. PubMed ID: 28285232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CJCheck Stage 1: development and testing of a checklist for reporting community juries - Delphi process and analysis of studies published in 1996-2015.
    Thomas R; Sims R; Degeling C; Street JM; Carter SM; Rychetnik L; Whitty JA; Wilson A; Ward P; Glasziou P
    Health Expect; 2017 Aug; 20(4):626-637. PubMed ID: 27704684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: a systematic review.
    Street J; Duszynski K; Krawczyk S; Braunack-Mayer A
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 May; 109():1-9. PubMed ID: 24657639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do consumer voices in health-care citizens' juries matter?
    Krinks R; Kendall E; Whitty JA; Scuffham PA
    Health Expect; 2016 Oct; 19(5):1015-22. PubMed ID: 26414486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The power of meaningful numbers: Attorney guidance and jury deliberation improve the reliability and gist validity of damage awards.
    Reed K; Hans VP; Rotenstein V; Helm RK; Rodriguez A; McKendall P; Reyna VF
    Law Hum Behav; 2024 Apr; 48(2):83-103. PubMed ID: 38602803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Citizens' juries in planning research priorities: process, engagement and outcome.
    Gooberman-Hill R; Horwood J; Calnan M
    Health Expect; 2008 Sep; 11(3):272-81. PubMed ID: 18816323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Harnessing the potential to quantify public preferences for healthcare priorities through citizens' juries.
    Whitty JA; Burton P; Kendall E; Ratcliffe J; Wilson A; Littlejohns P; Scuffham PA
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2014 Jul; 3(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 25114943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Engaging the public in healthcare decision-making: quantifying preferences for healthcare through citizens' juries.
    Scuffham PA; Ratcliffe J; Kendall E; Burton P; Wilson A; Chalkidou K; Littlejohns P; Whitty JA
    BMJ Open; 2014 May; 4(5):e005437. PubMed ID: 24793259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the impact of deliberative processes on the views of participants: is it 'in one ear and out the other'?
    Stafinski T; Menon D; Yasui Y
    Health Expect; 2014 Apr; 17(2):278-90. PubMed ID: 22296492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Citizens' Jury and Elder Care: Public Participation and Deliberation in Long-Term Care Policy in Thailand.
    Chuengsatiansup K; Tengrang K; Posayanonda T; Sihapark S
    J Aging Soc Policy; 2019; 31(4):378-392. PubMed ID: 29452043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Public attitudes towards novel reproductive technologies: a citizens' jury on mitochondrial donation.
    Newson AJ; de Lacey S; Dowling DK; Murray S; Sue CM; Thorburn DR; Gillam L; Degeling C
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 34(4):751-757. PubMed ID: 30865256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Mnemonic Consequences of Jurors' Selective Retrieval During Deliberation.
    Jay ACV; Stone CB; Meksin R; Merck C; Gordon NS; Hirst W
    Top Cogn Sci; 2019 Oct; 11(4):627-643. PubMed ID: 31231981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrating Citizens Juries and Discrete Choice Experiments: Methodological issues in the measurement of public values in healthcare priority setting.
    Schoon R; Chi C
    Soc Sci Med; 2022 Sep; 309():115223. PubMed ID: 35969981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantifying public preferences for healthcare priorities in Taiwan through an integrated citizens jury and discrete choice experiment.
    Schoon R; Chi C; Liu TC
    Soc Sci Med; 2022 Dec; 315():115404. PubMed ID: 36410140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial.
    Carman KL; Mallery C; Maurer M; Wang G; Garfinkel S; Yang M; Gilmore D; Windham A; Ginsburg M; Sofaer S; Gold M; Pathak-Sen E; Davies T; Siegel J; Mangrum R; Fernandez J; Richmond J; Fishkin J; Siu Chao A
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 May; 133():11-20. PubMed ID: 25828260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identifying approaches for synthesizing and summarizing information to support informed citizen deliberations in health policy: a scoping review.
    Wilson MG; Nidumolu A; Berditchevskaia I; Gauvin FP; Abelson J; Lavis JN
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2020 Jan; 25(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 31523997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Obtaining consumer perspectives using a citizens' jury: does the current country of origin labelling in Australia allow for informed food choices?
    Withall E; Wilson AM; Henderson J; Tonkin E; Coveney J; Meyer SB; Clark J; McCullum D; Ankeny R; Ward PR
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Dec; 16(1):1241. PubMed ID: 27938403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.