162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30864821)
1. Influence of cone beam CT volume orientation on alveolar bone measurements in patients with different facial profiles.
Costa ED; Peyneau PD; Ambrosano GMB; Oliveira ML
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Sep; 48(6):20180330. PubMed ID: 30864821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An In Vivo and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Investigation of the Accuracy in Measuring Alveolar Bone Height and Detecting Dehiscence and Fenestration Defects.
Peterson AG; Wang M; Gonzalez S; Covell DA; Katancik J; Sehgal HS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1296-1304. PubMed ID: 30427960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of Head Orientation in Linear Measurement for Implant Planning in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A; Tabari S; Yarmohammadi S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Jul; 16(7):542-6. PubMed ID: 26329408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Jawbone measurements of edentulous sites related to implant planning using magnetic resonance imaging compared to cone beam computed tomography: An ex vivo study.
Fuglsig JMCES; Schropp L; Hansen B; Wenzel A; Spin-Neto R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Feb; 35(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 37985190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphometric analysis of mandibular trabecular bone using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
Naitoh M; Aimiya H; Hirukawa A; Ariji E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1093-8. PubMed ID: 21197484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Mandibular First Molars' Axial Inclination and Alveolar Morphology in Different Facial Patterns: A CBCT Study.
Ferreira MC; Freitas KMS; Herrera-Sanches FS; Santos PBD; Garib D; Janson G; Freitas MR
Eur J Dent; 2020 Mar; 14(2):250-259. PubMed ID: 32438429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology.
Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes in alveolar bone width around maxillary implants, as determined through cone beam computed tomography based on bony landmarks: A preliminary study.
Lin SW; Hu KF; Lin YC; Liu PF; Chou YH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Oct; 25(5):861-870. PubMed ID: 37259681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of digital panoramic radiography versus cone beam computerized tomography for measuring alveolar bone.
Tang Z; Liu X; Chen K
Head Face Med; 2017 Feb; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 28228135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A deep learning approach for dental implant planning in cone-beam computed tomography images.
Kurt Bayrakdar S; Orhan K; Bayrakdar IS; Bilgir E; Ezhov M; Gusarev M; Shumilov E
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 May; 21(1):86. PubMed ID: 34011314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images.
Wood R; Sun Z; Chaudhry J; Tee BC; Kim DG; Leblebicioglu B; England G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Mar; 143(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 23452969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Osseointegration in Implants using Digital Orthopantomogram and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Chopra A; Mhapuskar AA; Marathe S; Nisa SU; Thopte S; Saddiwal R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):953-957. PubMed ID: 27965508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between anterior mandibular bone thickness and the angulation of incisors and canines-a CBCT study.
Srebrzyńska-Witek A; Koszowski R; Różyło-Kalinowska I
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1567-1578. PubMed ID: 29063382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Diagnostic value of dental implants in the posterior maxilla using cone beam computed tomography].
Fan LF; Pan XG; Pu YP; Lai HC
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Oct; 17(5):548-51. PubMed ID: 18989602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of CBCT images in the assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant defects: effect of field of view.
Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Kılıç C; Yüksel S; Avsever H; Farman A; Scarfe WC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(4):20130332. PubMed ID: 24645965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of bone anatomical morphology of mandibular molars on dental implant based on CBCT.
Kong ZL; Wang GG; Liu XY; Ye ZY; Xu DQ; Ding X
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Oct; 21(1):528. PubMed ID: 34654414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth.
Patcas R; Müller L; Ullrich O; Peltomäki T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jan; 141(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 22196184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
Timock AM; Cook V; McDonald T; Leo MC; Crowe J; Benninger BL; Covell DA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone-beam computed tomography.
Shiratori LN; Marotti J; Yamanouchi J; Chilvarquer I; Contin I; Tortamano-Neto P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):797-804. PubMed ID: 21631591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: A systematic review.
Fokas G; Vaughn VM; Scarfe WC; Bornstein MM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():393-415. PubMed ID: 30328204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
