BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30865780)

  • 1. Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a cephalometric appraisal.
    Faco R; Yatabe M; Cevidanes LHS; Timmerman H; De Clerck HJ; Garib D
    Eur J Orthod; 2019 Sep; 41(5):537-543. PubMed ID: 30865780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of bone-anchored maxillary protraction on secondary alveolar bone graft status in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.
    Stangherlin Gomes O; Carvalho RM; Faco R; Yatabe M; Ozawa TO; De Clerck H; Timmerman H; Garib D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Nov; 158(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 32950337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone-anchored maxillary protraction long-term outcomes in UCLP.
    Garib D; Pugliese F; Kato RM; Faco R; Yatabe M; Timmerman H; De Clerck H
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Sep; 90(5):734-741. PubMed ID: 33378483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rationale and design for efficacy and safety evaluation of Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction (BAMP) for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate with skeletal anterior crossbite: a single-arm, open-label, non-randomised prospective study protocol.
    Shimada E; Kanetaka H; Yamauchi K; Takahashi T; Nochioka K; Igarashi K
    BMJ Open; 2022 Sep; 12(9):e061831. PubMed ID: 36581967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and Class III malocclusion.
    Ren Y; Steegman R; Dieters A; Jansma J; Stamatakis H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2429-2441. PubMed ID: 30306334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Elabbassy EH; Sabet NE; Hassan IT; Elghoul DH; Elkassaby MA
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Jul; 90(4):539-547. PubMed ID: 33378498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of Different Methods of Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction in Cleft Lip and Palate Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Jahanbin A; Shafaee H; Pahlavan H; Bardideh E; Entezari M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2023 May; 34(3):875-880. PubMed ID: 36044271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maxillary Protraction With Intermaxillary Elastics to Miniplates Versus Bone-Anchored Face-Mask Therapy in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.
    Jahanbin A; Kazemian M; Eslami N; Pouya IS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 27(5):1247-52. PubMed ID: 27391495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting on the Maxillary Growth: Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.
    Seo J; Kim S; Yang IH; Baek SH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2128-32. PubMed ID: 26468796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Late maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a retrospective study.
    Borzabadi-Farahani A; Lane CJ; Yen SL
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2014 Jan; 51(1):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 23237432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone-anchored maxillary protraction therapy in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate: 3-dimensional assessment of maxillary effects.
    Yatabe M; Garib DG; Faco RAS; de Clerck H; Janson G; Nguyen T; Cevidanes LHS; Ruellas AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):327-335. PubMed ID: 28863913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mandibular and glenoid fossa changes after bone-anchored maxillary protraction therapy in patients with UCLP: A 3-D preliminary assessment.
    Yatabe M; Garib D; Faco R; de Clerck H; Souki B; Janson G; Nguyen T; Cevidanes L; Ruellas A
    Angle Orthod; 2017 May; 87(3):423-431. PubMed ID: 27802079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maxillary Protraction Therapy in Class III Patients With and Without Cleft Lip and Palate: An Interim Report of a Prospective Comparative Study.
    Lin Y; Fu Z; Guo R; Ma L; Li W
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2021 Apr; 58(4):429-437. PubMed ID: 32985240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of different maxillary advancement protocols in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a finite element analysis.
    Akdemir G; Gorucu-Coskuner H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Apr; 28(5):260. PubMed ID: 38642152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Alt-RAMEC With Facemask in Patients With Unilateral Cleft lip and Palate (UCLP) Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Finite Element Modeling-A Clinical Prospective Study.
    Singh S; Batra P; Raghavan S; Sharma K; Srivastava A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2022 Feb; 59(2):166-176. PubMed ID: 33754882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate in mixed dentition: cephalometric evaluation after completion of growth.
    Susami T; Okayasu M; Inokuchi T; Ohkubo K; Uchino N; Uwatoko K; Takahashi-Ichikawa N; Nagahama K; Takato T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2014 Sep; 51(5):514-24. PubMed ID: 24010865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effect of maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate and anterior crossbite].
    Jia HC; Li WR; Lin JX
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Dec; 41(12):723-7. PubMed ID: 17349192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Transverse Craniofacial Morphology of Adolescents With Repaired Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
    Buyuk SK; Celikoglu M; Benkli YA; Sekerci AE
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 27(7):1870-1874. PubMed ID: 27763978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.
    Ahn HW; Kim KW; Yang IH; Choi JY; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):935-41. PubMed ID: 22380632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative cephalometric study for adult operated cleft palate and unoperated cleft palate patients.
    Ye B; Wu Y; Zhou Y; Jing H; Hu J; Zhang G
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 43(7):1218-23. PubMed ID: 26044079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.