BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30866007)

  • 1. Transitioning from Infertility-Based (ART 1.0) to Elective (ART 2.0) Use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies and the DOHaD Hypothesis: Do We Need to Change Consenting?
    Rinaudo P; Adeleye A
    Semin Reprod Med; 2018 May; 36(3-04):204-210. PubMed ID: 30866007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2003 Aug; 52(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 14532867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century.
    Inhorn MC; Patrizio P
    Hum Reprod Update; 2015; 21(4):411-26. PubMed ID: 25801630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Workshop report: evaluation of genetic and epigenetic risks associated with assisted reproductive technologies and infertility.
    Weksberg R; Shuman C; Wilkins-Haug L; Mann M; Croughan M; Stewart D; Rakowsky C; Leader A; Hall J; Friedman JM; Simpson JL; Holmes L; Infante-Rivard C
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jul; 88(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 17442312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.
    Okun N; Sierra S; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jan; 36(1):64-83. PubMed ID: 24444289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with underlying diagnosis with and without assisted reproductive technology treatment.
    Stern JE; Luke B; Tobias M; Gopal D; Hornstein MD; Diop H
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Jun; 103(6):1438-45. PubMed ID: 25813277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can assisted reproductive technologies cause adult-onset disease? Evidence from human and mouse.
    Vrooman LA; Bartolomei MS
    Reprod Toxicol; 2017 Mar; 68():72-84. PubMed ID: 27474254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assisted Reproductive Technology and Origins of Disease: The Clinical Realities and Implications.
    Morin SJ; Seli E
    Semin Reprod Med; 2018 May; 36(3-04):195-203. PubMed ID: 30866006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic and epigenetic risks of assisted reproduction.
    Jiang Z; Wang Y; Lin J; Xu J; Ding G; Huang H
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Oct; 44():90-104. PubMed ID: 28844405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes after assisted reproductive technology.
    Wennberg AL; Opdahl S; Bergh C; Aaris Henningsen AK; Gissler M; Romundstad LB; Pinborg A; Tiitinen A; Skjærven R; Wennerholm UB
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Oct; 106(5):1142-1149.e14. PubMed ID: 27399261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the epigenetic risks of assisted reproductive technologies: a way forward.
    Zacchini F; Sampino S; Stankiewicz AM; Haaf T; Ptak GE
    Int J Dev Biol; 2019; 63(3-4-5):217-222. PubMed ID: 31058298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of parental physiological conditions and assisted reproductive technologies on the pregnancy and birth outcomes in infertile patients.
    Zhong X; Liu J; Cui Q; Liang S; Lin Y; Liu H; Zeng Q
    Oncotarget; 2017 Mar; 8(11):18409-18416. PubMed ID: 27741507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trends in ectopic pregnancy rates following assisted reproductive technologies in the UK: a 12-year nationwide analysis including 160 000 pregnancies.
    Santos-Ribeiro S; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):393-402. PubMed ID: 26724796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Flowers L; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2012 Nov; 61(7):1-23. PubMed ID: 23114281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).
    Declercq E; Luke B; Belanoff C; Cabral H; Diop H; Gopal D; Hoang L; Kotelchuck M; Stern JE; Hornstein MD
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):888-95. PubMed ID: 25660721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Follow-up of children born after ART.
    Basatemur E; Sutcliffe A
    Placenta; 2008 Oct; 29 Suppl B():135-40. PubMed ID: 18790325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2001.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G; Kissin D
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2004 Apr; 53(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15123982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiovascular dysfunction in children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies.
    Scherrer U; Rexhaj E; Allemann Y; Sartori C; Rimoldi SF
    Eur Heart J; 2015 Jul; 36(25):1583-9. PubMed ID: 25911649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assisted reproductive technology, epigenetics, and long-term health: a developmental time bomb still ticking.
    Grace KS; Sinclair KD
    Semin Reprod Med; 2009 Sep; 27(5):409-16. PubMed ID: 19711251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.