151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30866472)
1. Classifying Breast Cancer Subtypes Using Multiple Kernel Learning Based on Omics Data.
Tao M; Song T; Du W; Han S; Zuo C; Li Y; Wang Y; Yang Z
Genes (Basel); 2019 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 30866472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The method for breast cancer grade prediction and pathway analysis based on improved multiple kernel learning.
Song T; Wang Y; Du W; Cao S; Tian Y; Liang Y
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 15(1):1650037. PubMed ID: 27899048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Classifying Breast Cancer Subtypes Using Deep Neural Networks Based on Multi-Omics Data.
Lin Y; Zhang W; Cao H; Li G; Du W
Genes (Basel); 2020 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 32759821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Epigenetic silencing of triple negative breast cancer hallmarks by Withaferin A.
Szarc Vel Szic K; Declerck K; Crans RAJ; Diddens J; Scherf DB; Gerhäuser C; Vanden Berghe W
Oncotarget; 2017 Jun; 8(25):40434-40453. PubMed ID: 28467815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Molecular Profiling of Breast Carcinoma in Almadinah, KSA: Immunophenotyping and Clinicopathological Correlation.
Elkablawy MA; Albasry AM; Hussainy AS; Nouh MM; Alhujaily A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(17):7819-24. PubMed ID: 26625804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comprehensive profiling of biological processes reveals two major prognostic subtypes in breast cancer.
Chen F; Gao S; Wang F; Ma J; Zhang M; Lv M; Zhou Q; Fu Z; Lu C; Yin H
Tumour Biol; 2016 Mar; 37(3):3365-70. PubMed ID: 26446459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Poor prognosis of single hormone receptor- positive breast cancer: similar outcome as triple-negative breast cancer.
Bae SY; Kim S; Lee JH; Lee HC; Lee SK; Kil WH; Kim SW; Lee JE; Nam SJ
BMC Cancer; 2015 Mar; 15():138. PubMed ID: 25880075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between p53 and epidermal growth factor receptor expression in breast cancer classification.
Wang XZ; Liu Q; Sun JJ; Zuo WS; Hu DW; Ma SG; Mu DB; Yu ZY
Genet Mol Res; 2015 Apr; 14(2):4282-90. PubMed ID: 25966200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring novel targets of basal-like breast carcinoma by comparative gene profiling and mechanism analysis.
Wu YM; Hu W; Wang Y; Wang N; Gao L; Chen ZZ; Zheng WQ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Aug; 141(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 23933801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative Real Time PCR assessment of hormonal receptors and HER2 status on fine-needle aspiration pre-operatory specimens from a prospectively accrued cohort of women with suspect breast malignant lesions.
Garuti A; Rocco I; Cirmena G; Chiaramondia M; Baccini P; Calabrese M; Palermo C; Friedman D; Zoppoli G; Ballestrero A
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Feb; 132(2):389-96. PubMed ID: 24269902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ER-/PR+/HER2- breast cancer type shows the highest proliferative activity among all other combined phenotypes and is more common in young patients: Experience with 6643 breast cancer cases.
Arena V; Pennacchia I; Vecchio FM; Carbone A
Breast J; 2019 May; 25(3):381-385. PubMed ID: 30916428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic Landscape and Endocrine-Resistant Subgroup in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Progesterone Receptor-Negative, and HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.
Liu XY; Ma D; Xu XE; Jin X; Yu KD; Jiang YZ; Shao ZM
Theranostics; 2018; 8(22):6386-6399. PubMed ID: 30613307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status in invasive breast cancer: a 3,198 cases study at National Cancer Center, China.
Zhu X; Ying J; Wang F; Wang J; Yang H
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Oct; 147(3):551-5. PubMed ID: 25234844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of molecular subtype on breast cancer recurrence in young women treated with contemporary adjuvant therapy.
Alabdulkareem H; Pinchinat T; Khan S; Landers A; Christos P; Simmons R; Moo TA
Breast J; 2018 Mar; 24(2):148-153. PubMed ID: 28707744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Triple-negative breast cancers - a panoply of cancer types.
Pareja F; Reis-Filho JS
Nat Rev Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 15(6):347-348. PubMed ID: 29555966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between body mass index and the expression of hormone receptors or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 with respect to breast cancer survival.
Jeon YW; Kang SH; Park MH; Lim W; Cho SH; Suh YJ
BMC Cancer; 2015 Nov; 15():865. PubMed ID: 26546331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast cancer FNA cell blocks and paired histologic specimens: A large retrospective study.
Vohra P; Buelow B; Chen YY; Serrano M; Vohra MS; Berry A; Ljung BM
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Nov; 124(11):828-835. PubMed ID: 27315045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Targeting the Molecular Subtypes of Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Understanding the Diversity to Progress the Field.
Yam C; Mani SA; Moulder SL
Oncologist; 2017 Sep; 22(9):1086-1093. PubMed ID: 28559413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of BRCA1/2 defects with genomic scores predictive of DNA damage repair deficiency among breast cancer subtypes.
Timms KM; Abkevich V; Hughes E; Neff C; Reid J; Morris B; Kalva S; Potter J; Tran TV; Chen J; Iliev D; Sangale Z; Tikishvili E; Perry M; Zharkikh A; Gutin A; Lanchbury JS
Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):475. PubMed ID: 25475740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Androgen Receptor Biology in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: a Case for Classification as AR+ or Quadruple Negative Disease.
Barton VN; D'Amato NC; Gordon MA; Christenson JL; Elias A; Richer JK
Horm Cancer; 2015 Dec; 6(5-6):206-13. PubMed ID: 26201402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
