180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30866832)
1. A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017.
Rombey T; Allers K; Mathes T; Hoffmann F; Pieper D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 30866832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols.
van der Braak K; Ghannad M; Orelio C; Heus P; Damen JAA; Spijker R; Robinson K; Lund H; Hooft L
Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 11(1):191. PubMed ID: 36064610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inconsistent views among systematic review authors toward publishing protocols as peer-reviewed articles: an international survey.
Rombey T; Puljak L; Allers K; Ruano J; Pieper D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 123():9-17. PubMed ID: 32201257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inconsistencies in study eligibility criteria are common between non-Cochrane systematic reviews and their protocols registered in PROSPERO.
Hu K; Zhao L; Zhou Q; Mei F; Gao Q; Chen F; Jiang M; Zhao B; Zhang W; Kwong JSW; Ma Y; Mou C; Ma B
Res Synth Methods; 2021 May; 12(3):394-405. PubMed ID: 33522101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic reviews with published protocols compared to those without: more effort, older search.
Allers K; Hoffmann F; Mathes T; Pieper D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():102-110. PubMed ID: 29258907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perspectives on systematic review protocol registration: a survey amongst stakeholders in the clinical research publication process.
van der Braak K; Heus P; Orelio C; Netterström-Wedin F; Robinson KA; Lund H; Hooft L
Syst Rev; 2023 Dec; 12(1):234. PubMed ID: 38098085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characteristics of registered and published systematic reviews focusing on the prevention of COVID-19: a meta-research study.
Nothacker J; Stadelmaier J; Siemens W; Meerpohl JJ; Schmucker C
BMJ Open; 2022 May; 12(5):e060255. PubMed ID: 35534064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The fate of urological systematic reviews registered in PROSPERO.
Khaleel S; Cleveland B; Kalapara A; Sathianathen N; Balaji P; Dahm P
World J Urol; 2020 Nov; 38(11):2981-2986. PubMed ID: 31784773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Half of systematic reviews about pain registered in PROSPERO were not published and the majority had inaccurate status.
Runjic E; Rombey T; Pieper D; Puljak L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Dec; 116():114-121. PubMed ID: 31476376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis with protocols in Diabetes Mellitus Type II: A systematic review.
Rainkie DC; Abedini ZS; Abdelkader NN
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243091. PubMed ID: 33326429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.
Shamseer L; Moher D; Clarke M; Ghersi D; Liberati A; Petticrew M; Shekelle P; Stewart LA;
BMJ; 2015 Jan; 350():g7647. PubMed ID: 25555855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are child-centric aspects in newborn and child health systematic review and meta-analysis protocols and reports adequately reported?-two systematic reviews.
Farid-Kapadia M; Joachim KC; Balasingham C; Clyburne-Sherin A; Offringa M
Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 6(1):31. PubMed ID: 28260528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers.
Tawfik GM; Giang HTN; Ghozy S; Altibi AM; Kandil H; Le HH; Eid PS; Radwan I; Makram OM; Hien TTT; Sherif M; Hossain AS; Thang TLL; Puljak L; Salem H; Numair T; Moji K; Huy NT
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):213. PubMed ID: 32842968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Overview authors rarely defined systematic reviews that are included in their overviews.
Faggion CM; Diaz KT
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 May; 109():70-79. PubMed ID: 30684566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How is AMSTAR applied by authors - a call for better reporting.
Pieper D; Koensgen N; Breuing J; Ge L; Wegewitz U
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):56. PubMed ID: 29914386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three out of four published systematic reviews on COVID-19 treatments were not registered and one-third of those registered were published: a meta-research study.
Siemens W; Nothacker J; Stadelmaier J; Meerpohl JJ; Schmucker C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 152():36-46. PubMed ID: 36179937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characteristics, quality and volume of the first 5 months of the COVID-19 evidence synthesis infodemic: a meta-research study.
Abbott R; Bethel A; Rogers M; Whear R; Orr N; Shaw L; Stein K; Thompson Coon J
BMJ Evid Based Med; 2022 Jun; 27(3):169-177. PubMed ID: 34083212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determining the Completeness of Registration and Reporting in Systematic Reviews of Yoga for Health.
Bethel K; Faciszewski H; Ballis S; Sullivan M; Wieland LS
J Integr Complement Med; 2024 Apr; 30(4):336-344. PubMed ID: 37967461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
